VSTL vs. QTUM
VSTL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSTL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. VSTL is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VSTL charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
VSTL vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSTL achieves a -23.84% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 41.37% return.
VSTL
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 12.67%
- 6M
- -26.65%
- YTD
- -23.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- 6M
- 33.03%
- YTD
- 41.37%
- 1Y
- 69.29%
- 3Y*
- 46.36%
- 5Y*
- 26.92%
- 10Y*
- —
VSTL vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VSTL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF | -23.84% | -37.40% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 41.37% | 16.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSTL and QTUM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSTL vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
VSTL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTUM
VSTL vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF (VSTL) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSTL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSTL vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSTL drawdown since its inception was -71.42%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSTL and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSTL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.42% | -38.45% | -32.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.64% | -8.32% | -54.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -8.21% | -34.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility
VSTL vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSTL | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.22% | 30.13% | +67.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.22% | 27.38% | +69.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.22% | 27.55% | +69.67% |
VSTL vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSTL has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSTL vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
VSTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.76% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
VSTL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSTL and QTUM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for VSTL.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for VSTL.
VSTL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for VSTL and 0.40% for QTUM.
Find the right allocation for VSTL and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer