VSTL vs. NBIG
VSTL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VSTL charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.
Performance
VSTL vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSTL achieves a -35.33% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 126.41% return.
VSTL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -6.33%
- 6M
- -28.91%
- YTD
- -35.33%
- 1Y
- -66.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -58.65%
NBIG
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -36.58%
- 6M
- 133.65%
- YTD
- 126.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $50.87M | $45.72M | $37.32M | |
| $651.64K | $708.80K | $1.90M |
VSTL vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VSTL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF | -35.33% | -40.09% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 126.41% | -59.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSTL and NBIG is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSTL vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank
VSTL
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VSTL vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF (VSTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSTL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSTL vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSTL drawdown since its inception was -71.42%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -78.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSTL and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSTL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.42% | -78.77% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.28% | -66.61% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.67% | -42.08% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.96% | — | — |
Volatility
VSTL vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSTL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.01% | 218.72% | -121.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.03% | 218.72% | -121.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.03% | 218.72% | -121.69% |
VSTL vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSTL has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSTL vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither VSTL nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VSTL and NBIG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for VSTL.
VSTL and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for VSTL and 0.75% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for VSTL and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer