VSPMX vs. FZAMX
VSPMX (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index Fund Institutional Shares) and FZAMX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VSPMX returned 11.38%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for FZAMX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VSPMX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FZAMX.
Performance
VSPMX vs. FZAMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSPMX achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly lower than FZAMX's 25.16% return. Over the past 10 years, VSPMX has underperformed FZAMX with an annualized return of 11.38%, while FZAMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.86% annualized return.
VSPMX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
FZAMX
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 25.16%
- 6M
- 22.19%
- 1Y
- 42.92%
- 3Y*
- 21.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
VSPMX vs. FZAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSPMX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index Fund Institutional Shares | 15.40% | 7.11% | 12.83% | 17.42% | -13.12% | 24.66% | 13.53% | 26.12% | -11.14% | 16.18% |
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z | 25.16% | 12.00% | 17.39% | 15.15% | -14.70% | 25.40% | 18.84% | 23.85% | -14.85% | 20.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSPMX and FZAMX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013 | 0.97 |
The correlation between VSPMX and FZAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSPMX vs. FZAMX — Risk / Return Rank
VSPMX
FZAMX
VSPMX vs. FZAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSPMX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSPMX | FZAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.42 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 4.41 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.27 | 17.63 | -6.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSPMX vs. FZAMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSPMX drawdown since its inception was -42.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FZAMX drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSPMX and FZAMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSPMX | FZAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.04% | -42.32% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -9.77% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.27% | -25.24% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.27% | -25.24% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.04% | -42.32% | +0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.16% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -6.06% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.44% | -0.03% |
Volatility
VSPMX vs. FZAMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSPMX) is 4.86%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that VSPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSPMX | FZAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 5.81% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 14.22% | -2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 17.67% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 20.30% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 20.98% | +0.06% |
VSPMX vs. FZAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSPMX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FZAMX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSPMX vs. FZAMX - Dividend Comparison
VSPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than FZAMX's 5.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z | 5.63% | 10.09% | 6.93% | 2.83% | 5.86% | 18.58% | 1.41% | 3.50% | 10.72% | 7.81% | 5.00% | 4.90% |
VSPMX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.21% | 1.07% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.59% | 1.15% | 1.24% | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VSPMX and FZAMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FZAMX has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to VSPMX (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSPMX dropped -42.04% vs FZAMX's -42.32%.
FZAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSPMX and FZAMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer