PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSPGX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSPGX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSPGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSPGX achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 0.30% return.


VSPGX

1D
1.46%
1M
-0.25%
6M
9.07%
YTD
10.02%
1Y
21.63%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.84%

FSPGX

1D
0.83%
1M
-2.42%
6M
1.53%
YTD
0.30%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VSPGX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSPGX
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
10.02%21.91%35.48%30.38%-29.46%31.88%33.34%31.06%-0.05%23.40%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.30%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%24.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VSPGX and FSPGX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.98

The correlation between VSPGX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSPGX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VSPGX
VSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VSPGX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSPGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSPGXFSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.09

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

0.50

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.18

1.49

+3.70

VSPGX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSPGX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSPGX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSPGX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, roughly equal to the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSPGX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSPGXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-32.66%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-16.17%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.34%

-23.32%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-32.66%

-0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.38%

-7.99%

+3.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-6.36%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

5.40%

-1.65%

Volatility

VSPGX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSPGX) is 6.03%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that VSPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSPGXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

6.43%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.81%

14.04%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

17.51%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

21.80%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

21.58%

-0.20%

VSPGX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSPGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSPGX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

VSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than FSPGX's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.39%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%
VSPGX
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.48%0.38%0.50%1.14%0.95%0.55%0.89%0.68%0.31%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VSPGX and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSPGX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to VSPGX (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSPGX dropped -32.73% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

VSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSPGX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer