VSLU vs. DMAY
VSLU (Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. VSLU is actively managed, while DMAY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VSLU returned 14.42%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSLU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
VSLU vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSLU achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.73% return.
VSLU
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 27.23%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- 12.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
VSLU vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSLU Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF | 6.76% | 21.52% | 23.80% | 26.79% | -16.05% | 14.05% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.73% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSLU and DMAY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between VSLU and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
VSLU vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSLU
DMAY
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
VSLU
DMAY
Communication Services
VSLU
DMAY
Healthcare
VSLU
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
VSLU
DMAY
Financial Services
VSLU
DMAY
Industrials
VSLU
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
VSLU
DMAY
Energy
VSLU
DMAY
Utilities
VSLU
DMAY
Basic Materials
VSLU
DMAY
Real Estate
VSLU
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSLU vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
VSLU
DMAY
VSLU vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSLU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 2.79 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 4.20 | -1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.63 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.06 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | 24.92 | -11.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSLU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.79 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.81 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.88 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
VSLU vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSLU drawdown since its inception was -23.86%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSLU and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSLU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.86% | -13.90% | -9.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -3.36% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -12.38% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.86% | -13.90% | -9.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | 0.00% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -2.24% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 0.55% | +1.51% |
Volatility
VSLU vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) has a higher volatility of 2.41% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.76%. This indicates that VSLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSLU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 0.76% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 3.73% | +5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 4.71% | +7.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 9.02% | +7.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 8.43% | +7.71% |
VSLU vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSLU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSLU vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
VSLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSLU Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.60% | 0.60% | 0.99% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSLU and DMAY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSLU has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to DMAY (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSLU dropped -23.86% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 5-year performance, VSLU leads with 14.42% vs 7.26% for DMAY. On fees, VSLU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VSLU has performed better with a 14.42% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSLU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
VSLU has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
They also come from different issuers: Applied Finance and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VSLU and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSLU and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer