VSLU vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

VSLU (Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, VSLU returned 27.23% vs 48.53% for BLCR. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSLU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

VSLU vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSLU achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 19.96% return.

VSLU

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 7.74%
• 1Y: 27.23%
• 3Y*: 22.03%
• 5Y*: 14.42%
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 6.36%
• YTD: 19.96%
• 6M: 21.52%
• 1Y: 48.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSLU vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VSLU Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF	6.76%	21.52%	23.80%	15.08%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	19.96%	30.93%	17.07%	14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VSLU and BLCR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.86

The correlation between VSLU and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSLU vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VSLU	BLCR
Technology	36.3%	35.7%
Communication Services	14.7%	11.0%
Healthcare	11.6%	7.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	10.9%
Financial Services	9.4%	12.1%
Industrials	7.4%	13.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	-
Energy	2.3%	2.2%
Utilities	1.2%	1.6%
Basic Materials	1.1%	2.2%
Real Estate	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

VSLU vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSLU

VSLU Risk / Return Rank: 64
VSLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VSLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
VSLU Omega Ratio Rank: 63
VSLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VSLU Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 89
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSLU vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VSLU	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	3.14	-0.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	4.12	-1.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.54	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	4.86	-1.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.33	23.10	-9.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VSLU vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSLU and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VSLU	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	3.14	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.91	-1.03

Drawdowns

VSLU vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSLU drawdown since its inception was -23.86%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSLU and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	VSLU	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.86%	-21.29%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-10.26%	+1.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-0.04%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.89%	-2.19%	-2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.16%	-0.10%

Volatility

VSLU vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) is 2.41%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that VSLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VSLU	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.41%	4.43%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.24%	12.25%	-3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.48%	15.55%	-3.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.19%	17.48%	-1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.14%	17.48%	-1.34%

VSLU vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSLU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

VSLU vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

VSLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, more than BLCR's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.23%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%
VSLU Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF	0.43%	0.46%	0.60%	0.60%	0.99%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VSLU and BLCR in my portfolio?

VSLU and BLCR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VSLU or BLCR?

BLCR has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to VSLU (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSLU dropped -23.86% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which ETF is better, VSLU or BLCR?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 48.53% vs 27.23% for VSLU. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, VSLU has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VSLU or BLCR?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 48.53% return vs 27.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VSLU or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for VSLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VSLU or BLCR?

VSLU has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.23% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between VSLU and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Applied Finance and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VSLU and 0.36% for BLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.