PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSGIX vs. NBGNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSGIX vs. NBGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSGIX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSGIX achieves a 13.37% return, which is significantly higher than NBGNX's 12.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VSGIX has outperformed NBGNX with an annualized return of 10.77%, while NBGNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.36% annualized return.


VSGIX

1D
2.22%
1M
-4.69%
6M
9.37%
YTD
13.37%
1Y
23.57%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
4.18%
10Y*
10.77%
ALL TIME*
9.29%

NBGNX

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.53%
6M
7.03%
YTD
12.58%
1Y
12.79%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
9.36%
ALL TIME*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VSGIX vs. NBGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSGIX
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
13.37%8.44%14.95%23.07%-28.39%5.70%35.29%32.77%-5.70%21.94%
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
12.58%-4.70%9.04%15.57%-19.49%18.07%24.86%29.47%-6.91%15.83%

Correlation

The correlation between VSGIX and NBGNX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2000

0.92

The correlation between VSGIX and NBGNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSGIX vs. NBGNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VSGIX
VSGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VSGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VSGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGNX
NBGNX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NBGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VSGIX vs. NBGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSGIX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSGIXNBGNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

0.89

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

2.38

+3.66

VSGIX vs. NBGNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the NBGNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSGIX and NBGNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSGIX vs. NBGNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSGIX drawdown since its inception was -58.66%, which is greater than NBGNX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSGIX and NBGNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSGIXNBGNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.66%

-51.75%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-10.77%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.47%

-27.51%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.36%

-28.33%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

-34.53%

-4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.65%

-4.11%

-2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.29%

-7.15%

-4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

4.04%

-0.69%

Volatility

VSGIX vs. NBGNX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSGIX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) at 3.76%. This indicates that VSGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSGIXNBGNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

3.76%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.14%

11.36%

+4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.71%

16.30%

+4.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.74%

19.70%

+4.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.03%

20.20%

+2.83%

VSGIX vs. NBGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSGIX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than NBGNX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSGIX vs. NBGNX - Dividend Comparison

VSGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than NBGNX's 14.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
14.53%16.36%2.15%3.03%11.05%10.92%3.84%5.82%12.24%13.89%11.21%18.52%
VSGIX
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.45%0.55%0.55%0.68%0.56%0.37%0.45%0.58%0.80%0.82%1.09%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSGIX and NBGNX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSGIX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to NBGNX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSGIX dropped -58.66% vs NBGNX's -51.75%.

VSGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSGIX and NBGNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer