PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSFAX vs. VRTVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSFAX vs. VRTVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSFAX achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly lower than VRTVX's 21.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSFAX having a 11.16% annualized return and VRTVX not far behind at 10.95%.


VSFAX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.49%
YTD
16.16%
6M
14.66%
1Y
28.73%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
11.16%

VRTVX

1D
0.42%
1M
2.19%
YTD
21.41%
6M
18.86%
1Y
43.62%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSFAX vs. VRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
16.16%7.53%20.49%10.43%-8.82%30.14%9.13%19.67%-18.43%12.06%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
21.41%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between VSFAX and VRTVX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between VSFAX and VRTVX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSFAX vs. VRTVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSFAX
VSFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VSFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VSFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSFAX vs. VRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSFAXVRTVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

4.95

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.45

16.80

-6.36

VSFAX vs. VRTVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the VRTVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSFAX and VRTVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSFAX vs. VRTVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSFAX drawdown since its inception was -78.14%, which is greater than VRTVX's maximum drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSFAX and VRTVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSFAXVRTVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.14%

-45.98%

-32.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-8.54%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.07%

-26.85%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

-26.85%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.57%

-45.98%

-2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.81%

-7.75%

-13.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.51%

+0.39%

Volatility

VSFAX vs. VRTVX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) have volatilities of 5.36% and 5.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSFAXVRTVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

5.28%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

12.48%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.12%

18.21%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.31%

21.65%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

23.71%

+0.35%

VSFAX vs. VRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSFAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSFAX vs. VRTVX - Dividend Comparison

VSFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than VRTVX's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.64%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
2.97%3.45%20.39%2.91%9.15%8.62%0.11%0.35%23.83%16.53%2.33%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSFAX and VRTVX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSFAX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to VRTVX (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSFAX dropped -78.14% vs VRTVX's -45.98%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSFAX and VRTVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer