PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSFAX vs. ARSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSFAX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSFAX achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's -0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, VSFAX has outperformed ARSMX with an annualized return of 10.31%, while ARSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.25% annualized return.


VSFAX

1D
-1.22%
1M
1.44%
YTD
12.27%
6M
11.13%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
10.31%

ARSMX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-5.59%
1Y
0.64%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSFAX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
12.27%7.53%20.49%10.43%-8.82%30.14%9.13%19.67%-18.43%12.06%
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
-0.73%-0.83%12.42%14.48%-8.62%23.41%1.71%34.82%-6.44%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VSFAX and ARSMX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between VSFAX and ARSMX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSFAX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSFAX
VSFAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VSFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VSFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSMX
ARSMX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ARSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSFAX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSFAXARSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.01

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

0.02

+3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

0.05

+10.04

VSFAX vs. ARSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the ARSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSFAX and ARSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSFAXARSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

0.02

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.20

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.47

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.35

-0.10

Drawdowns

VSFAX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSFAX drawdown since its inception was -78.14%, which is greater than ARSMX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSFAX and ARSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSFAXARSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.14%

-51.75%

-26.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-10.37%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.07%

-19.34%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

-19.34%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.57%

-42.96%

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-8.18%

+6.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-8.11%

-12.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

4.37%

-1.47%

Volatility

VSFAX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 2.68%. This indicates that VSFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSFAXARSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

2.68%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

10.16%

+2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80%

14.36%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.33%

17.78%

+5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

19.57%

+4.49%

VSFAX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSFAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSFAX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison

VSFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, while ARSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%9.27%3.89%4.85%5.86%0.00%3.60%8.60%15.66%8.03%17.82%
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
3.07%3.45%20.39%2.91%9.15%8.62%0.11%0.35%23.83%16.53%2.33%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSFAX and ARSMX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSFAX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to ARSMX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSFAX dropped -78.14% vs ARSMX's -51.75%.

VSFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSFAX and ARSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer