PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSDB vs. LODI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSDB vs. LODI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB) and AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDB achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than LODI's 2.22% return.


VSDB

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.07%
6M
0.97%
YTD
1.02%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LODI

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.30%
6M
2.12%
YTD
2.22%
1Y
5.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSDB vs. LODI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VSDB and LODI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSDB vs. LODI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDB
VSDB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VSDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDB Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

LODI
LODI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LODI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LODI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LODI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LODI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
LODI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDB vs. LODI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB) and AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSDBLODIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.56

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

6.78

-3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.47

17.86

-4.39

VSDB vs. LODI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDB Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the LODI Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDB and LODI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSDB vs. LODI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDB drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, which is greater than LODI's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDB and LODI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSDBLODIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-1.01%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.42%

-0.75%

-0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.08%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.19%

-0.20%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

0.28%

+0.04%

Volatility

VSDB vs. LODI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB) has a higher volatility of 0.52% compared to AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) at 0.38%. This indicates that VSDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LODI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSDBLODIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

0.38%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

1.14%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75%

2.28%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.89%

2.29%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.89%

2.29%

-0.40%

VSDB vs. LODI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VSDB and LODI have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSDB vs. LODI - Dividend Comparison

VSDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than LODI's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LODI
AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF
4.97%5.11%0.38%
VSDB
Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares
4.18%3.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSDB and LODI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSDB has higher volatility (0.52%) compared to LODI (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDB dropped -1.42% vs LODI's -1.01%.

On 1-year performance, LODI leads with 5.05% vs 4.36% for VSDB. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, LODI has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LODI has performed better with a 5.05% return vs 4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSDB and LODI have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

LODI has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 4.18% for VSDB.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and AAM.

VSDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSDB and LODI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer