PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSCOX vs. NBGNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSCOX vs. NBGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund (VSCOX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSCOX achieves a 16.19% return, which is significantly higher than NBGNX's 6.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VSCOX has outperformed NBGNX with an annualized return of 13.17%, while NBGNX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.99% annualized return.


VSCOX

1D
0.73%
1M
5.22%
YTD
16.19%
6M
14.04%
1Y
26.68%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
13.17%

NBGNX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.48%
YTD
6.50%
6M
4.16%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
6.32%
5Y*
2.65%
10Y*
8.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSCOX vs. NBGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSCOX
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund
16.19%2.93%10.28%15.15%-19.02%14.03%24.71%30.18%-3.27%41.64%
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
6.50%-4.70%9.04%15.57%-19.49%18.07%24.86%29.47%-6.91%15.83%

Correlation

The correlation between VSCOX and NBGNX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 1997

0.90

The correlation between VSCOX and NBGNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSCOX vs. NBGNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSCOX
VSCOX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
VSCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGNX
NBGNX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NBGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSCOX vs. NBGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund (VSCOX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSCOXNBGNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

0.56

+1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

0.96

+1.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.11

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

0.84

+1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.83

2.25

+7.58

VSCOX vs. NBGNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSCOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the NBGNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSCOX and NBGNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSCOXNBGNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

0.56

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.14

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.45

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.65

-0.23

Drawdowns

VSCOX vs. NBGNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSCOX drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than NBGNX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSCOX and NBGNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSCOXNBGNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.58%

-51.75%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.33%

-10.77%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.08%

-27.51%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-28.33%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.28%

-34.53%

-3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-9.29%

+9.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-7.15%

-7.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.99%

-1.07%

Volatility

VSCOX vs. NBGNX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund (VSCOX) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) at 4.06%. This indicates that VSCOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSCOXNBGNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

4.06%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

11.31%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.10%

16.04%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

19.66%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

20.22%

+2.08%

VSCOX vs. NBGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSCOX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than NBGNX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSCOX vs. NBGNX - Dividend Comparison

VSCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than NBGNX's 15.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
15.36%16.36%2.15%3.03%11.05%10.92%3.84%5.82%12.24%13.89%11.21%18.52%
VSCOX
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund
4.88%5.67%0.93%0.27%2.31%7.53%1.91%3.20%38.00%11.76%17.41%16.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VSCOX and NBGNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSCOX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to NBGNX (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSCOX dropped -59.58% vs NBGNX's -51.75%.

VSCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSCOX and NBGNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer