PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTVX vs. PCSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTVX vs. PCSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTVX achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly higher than PCSVX's 13.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VRTVX has outperformed PCSVX with an annualized return of 10.34%, while PCSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.54% annualized return.


VRTVX

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.19%
YTD
17.44%
6M
16.47%
1Y
42.05%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
10.34%

PCSVX

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.33%
YTD
13.64%
6M
14.00%
1Y
27.60%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
8.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTVX vs. PCSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
17.44%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%
PCSVX
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments
13.64%4.33%6.24%12.57%-13.44%25.68%12.13%25.80%-16.67%9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTVX and PCSVX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.95

The correlation between VRTVX and PCSVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTVX vs. PCSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PCSVX
PCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTVX vs. PCSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTVXPCSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.31

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

3.04

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.53

9.15

+7.39

VRTVX vs. PCSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the PCSVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTVX and PCSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTVXPCSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.79

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.19

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.38

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.38

+0.09

Drawdowns

VRTVX vs. PCSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTVX drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, smaller than the maximum PCSVX drawdown of -62.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTVX and PCSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTVXPCSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.98%

-62.95%

+16.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-9.67%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.85%

-34.96%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-34.96%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.98%

-46.65%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-3.50%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-10.58%

+2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

3.20%

-0.69%

Volatility

VRTVX vs. PCSVX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) at 4.48%. This indicates that VRTVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTVXPCSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

4.48%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

11.68%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.00%

16.53%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

22.36%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

22.98%

+0.73%

VRTVX vs. PCSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PCSVX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRTVX vs. PCSVX - Dividend Comparison

VRTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than PCSVX's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCSVX
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments
3.12%3.54%18.45%0.69%22.49%16.23%0.61%0.83%7.14%11.82%2.62%11.87%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.60%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTVX and PCSVX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTVX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to PCSVX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTVX dropped -45.98% vs PCSVX's -62.95%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTVX and PCSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer