VRTL vs. NTSD
VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VRTL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
VRTL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VRTL
- 1D
- -8.17%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- 6M
- 137.91%
- YTD
- 157.20%
- 1Y
- 264.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRTL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 9.06% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 18.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRTL and NTSD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRTL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
VRTL
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VRTL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRTL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRTL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRTL drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTL and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRTL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.58% | -5.58% | -55.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.95% | -1.39% | -39.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.75% | -1.14% | -15.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.82% | — | — |
Volatility
VRTL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRTL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 50.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 95.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 123.18% | 23.54% | +99.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 127.88% | 23.54% | +104.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.88% | 23.54% | +104.34% |
VRTL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRTL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRTL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NTSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.14% |
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRTL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.
NTSD has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for VRTL and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for VRTL and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer