VRTL vs. GEVG
VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) and GEVG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VRTL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GEVG.
Performance
VRTL vs. GEVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRTL achieves a 49.92% return, which is significantly lower than GEVG's 83.92% return.
VRTL
- 1D
- 12.49%
- 1M
- -40.41%
- 6M
- 17.15%
- YTD
- 49.92%
- 1Y
- 64.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 134.30%
GEVG
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -23.99%
- 6M
- 50.84%
- YTD
- 83.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.08M | $1.70M | $2.00M | |
| $7.19M | $7.02M | $12.49M |
VRTL vs. GEVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 49.92% | -0.52% |
GEVG Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF | 83.92% | -11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRTL and GEVG is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRTL vs. GEVG — Risk / Return Rank
VRTL
GEVG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VRTL vs. GEVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRTL | GEVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRTL vs. GEVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRTL drawdown since its inception was -70.53%, which is greater than GEVG's maximum drawdown of -45.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTL and GEVG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRTL | GEVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.53% | -45.50% | -25.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.58% | -34.15% | -31.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.14% | -13.33% | -4.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.96% | — | — |
Volatility
VRTL vs. GEVG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRTL | GEVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 52.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 106.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 128.88% | 106.13% | +22.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 130.52% | 106.13% | +24.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 130.52% | 106.13% | +24.39% |
VRTL vs. GEVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRTL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GEVG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRTL vs. GEVG - Dividend Comparison
Neither VRTL nor GEVG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VRTL and GEVG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEVG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEVG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.
VRTL and GEVG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for VRTL and 0.75% for GEVG.
Find the right allocation for VRTL and GEVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer