PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTL vs. FTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTL vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTL achieves a 230.54% return, which is significantly higher than FTSD's 0.80% return.


VRTL

1D
-1.32%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
230.54%
6M
160.92%
1Y
442.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTSD

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.30%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*
2.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTL vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VRTL and FTSD is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTL vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTL
VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FTSD
FTSD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FTSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTL vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTLFTSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.69

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.40

9.59

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.03

38.36

-14.33

VRTL vs. FTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTL Sharpe Ratio is 3.91, which is comparable to the FTSD Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTL and FTSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTLFTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91

3.30

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.29

1.04

+2.25

Drawdowns

VRTL vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTL drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than FTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTL and FTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTLFTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.58%

-5.32%

-55.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.45%

-0.45%

-47.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.11%

-0.12%

-23.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.16%

-0.60%

-14.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.53%

0.11%

+18.42%

Volatility

VRTL vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) has a higher volatility of 33.79% compared to Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) at 0.51%. This indicates that VRTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTLFTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.79%

0.51%

+33.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.48%

1.03%

+86.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

114.32%

1.31%

+113.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

124.39%

1.85%

+122.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

124.39%

1.79%

+122.60%

VRTL vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRTL vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison

VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSD
Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF
4.50%4.67%4.75%4.14%1.73%1.01%1.54%2.90%2.63%2.24%1.92%1.52%
VRTL
GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTL and FTSD have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTL has higher volatility (33.79%) compared to FTSD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTL dropped -60.58% vs FTSD's -5.32%.

On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 442.54% vs 4.31% for FTSD. On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 442.54% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.

VRTL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FTSD is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for VRTL and 0.25% for FTSD.

VRTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 3.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTL and FTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer