VRTL vs. CRMU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) and CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. VRTL is actively managed, while CRMU is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VRTL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMU.

Performance

VRTL vs. CRMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

VRTL

• 1D: -22.65%
• 1M: -11.35%
• YTD: 187.83%
• 6M: 172.02%
• 1Y: 343.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMU

• 1D: -13.83%
• 1M: -28.54%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTL vs. CRMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	93.47%
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	-64.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTL and CRMU is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026	0.54

Return for Risk

VRTL vs. CRMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTL

VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 83
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

CRMU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTL vs. CRMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VRTL	CRMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.30	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.10	—	—

Drawdowns

VRTL vs. CRMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTL drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, smaller than the maximum CRMU drawdown of -73.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTL and CRMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRTL	CRMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.58%	-73.81%	+13.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.92%	-64.46%	+30.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.93%	-46.63%	+30.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VRTL	CRMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	43.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	92.17%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	119.83%	246.03%	-126.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.87%	246.03%	-119.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	126.87%	246.03%	-119.16%

VRTL vs. CRMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMU's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

VRTL vs. CRMU - Dividend Comparison

Neither VRTL nor CRMU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRTL and CRMU in my portfolio?

VRTL and CRMU have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VRTL or CRMU?

On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VRTL or CRMU?

CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VRTL or CRMU?

VRTL and CRMU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between VRTL and CRMU?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for VRTL and 0.75% for CRMU.