VRTL vs. CMGG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) and CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VRTL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CMGG.

Performance

VRTL vs. CMGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTL achieves a 187.83% return, which is significantly higher than CMGG's -37.52% return.

VRTL

• 1D: -22.65%
• 1M: -11.35%
• YTD: 187.83%
• 6M: 172.02%
• 1Y: 343.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMGG

• 1D: 2.82%
• 1M: -12.95%
• YTD: -37.52%
• 6M: -40.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTL vs. CMGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	187.83%	-14.68%
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	-37.52%	36.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTL and CMGG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

VRTL vs. CMGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTL

VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 83
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

CMGG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTL vs. CMGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VRTL	CMGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.30	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.10	—	—

Drawdowns

VRTL vs. CMGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTL drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than CMGG's maximum drawdown of -56.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTL and CMGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRTL	CMGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.58%	-56.75%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.92%	-48.19%	+14.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.93%	-23.37%	+7.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VRTL	CMGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	43.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	92.17%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	119.83%	68.93%	+50.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.87%	68.93%	+57.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	126.87%	68.93%	+57.94%

VRTL vs. CMGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CMGG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

VRTL vs. CMGG - Dividend Comparison

Neither VRTL nor CMGG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRTL and CMGG in my portfolio?

VRTL and CMGG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VRTL or CMGG?

On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VRTL or CMGG?

CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VRTL or CMGG?

VRTL and CMGG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between VRTL and CMGG?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for VRTL and 0.75% for CMGG.