PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTL vs. AAPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTL vs. AAPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares (AAPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTL achieves a 49.92% return, which is significantly higher than AAPU's 17.61% return.


VRTL

1D
12.49%
1M
-40.41%
6M
17.15%
YTD
49.92%
1Y
64.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
134.30%

AAPU

1D
-14.86%
1M
-1.17%
6M
30.99%
YTD
17.61%
1Y
101.24%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$87.91M$80.86M$75.86M
$7.19M$7.02M$12.49M

VRTL vs. AAPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VRTL
GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF
49.92%110.50%
AAPU
Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares
17.61%30.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTL and AAPU is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025

0.23

VRTL vs. AAPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VRTL
AAPU

Industrials

66.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

VRTL
66.7%
AAPU

-

Basic Materials

VRTL

-

AAPU

-

Communication Services

VRTL

-

AAPU

-

Consumer Cyclical

VRTL

-

AAPU

-

Consumer Defensive

VRTL

-

AAPU

-

Energy

VRTL

-

AAPU

-

Financial Services

VRTL

-

AAPU

-

Healthcare

VRTL

-

AAPU

-

Real Estate

VRTL

-

AAPU

-

Technology

VRTL

-

AAPU
100.0%

Utilities

VRTL

-

AAPU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTL vs. AAPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRTL
VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPU
AAPU Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AAPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPU Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRTL vs. AAPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares (AAPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRTLAAPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

3.14

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.20

7.22

-5.02

VRTL vs. AAPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the AAPU Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTL and AAPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRTL vs. AAPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTL drawdown since its inception was -70.53%, which is greater than AAPU's maximum drawdown of -58.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTL and AAPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTLAAPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.53%

-58.61%

-11.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.53%

-28.90%

-41.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.58%

-18.21%

-47.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.14%

-17.29%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.96%

12.58%

+12.38%

Volatility

VRTL vs. AAPU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) has a higher volatility of 52.00% compared to Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares (AAPU) at 23.35%. This indicates that VRTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTLAAPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

52.00%

23.35%

+28.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

106.22%

41.56%

+64.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

128.88%

51.73%

+77.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

130.52%

50.08%

+80.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

130.52%

50.08%

+80.44%

VRTL vs. AAPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPU's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRTL vs. AAPU - Dividend Comparison

VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AAPU
Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares
7.61%8.66%14.58%2.32%0.79%
VRTL
GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTL and AAPU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTL has higher volatility (52.00%) compared to AAPU (23.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTL dropped -70.53% vs AAPU's -58.61%.

On 1-year performance, AAPU leads with 101.24% vs 64.41% for VRTL. On fees, AAPU is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, AAPU has been the lower-risk option at 23.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPU has performed better with a 101.24% return vs 64.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAPU is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

AAPU has the higher dividend yield at 7.61%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for VRTL and 0.96% for AAPU.

AAPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTL and AAPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer