PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTGX vs. VTIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTGX vs. VTIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTGX achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly higher than VTIAX's 12.34% return. Over the past 10 years, VRTGX has outperformed VTIAX with an annualized return of 12.16%, while VTIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.


VRTGX

1D
-1.59%
1M
4.25%
YTD
20.25%
6M
16.70%
1Y
37.69%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
12.16%

VTIAX

1D
-3.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
12.34%
6M
12.20%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
18.81%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTGX vs. VTIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
20.25%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%
VTIAX
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
12.34%32.18%5.34%15.28%-16.02%8.59%11.27%21.52%-14.46%27.54%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTGX and VTIAX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2010

0.72

The correlation between VRTGX and VTIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTGX vs. VTIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VTIAX
VTIAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VTIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VTIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTGX vs. VTIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRTGXVTIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.62

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

10.17

-0.43

VRTGX vs. VTIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the VTIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTGX and VTIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRTGX vs. VTIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTGX drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, which is greater than VTIAX's maximum drawdown of -35.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTGX and VTIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTGXVTIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

-35.83%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

-11.28%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

-13.13%

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.48%

-29.52%

-10.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.97%

-35.83%

-6.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-3.00%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-8.05%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

2.90%

+1.23%

Volatility

VRTGX vs. VTIAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTIAX) at 6.80%. This indicates that VRTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTGXVTIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.85%

6.80%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.84%

13.40%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.28%

15.39%

+6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.72%

15.27%

+9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.57%

15.82%

+8.75%

VRTGX vs. VTIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VTIAX's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRTGX vs. VTIAX - Dividend Comparison

VRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VTIAX's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.61%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%
VTIAX
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.56%3.15%3.33%3.22%3.04%3.05%2.10%3.04%3.16%2.73%2.93%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTGX and VTIAX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTGX has higher volatility (7.85%) compared to VTIAX (6.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTGX dropped -41.97% vs VTIAX's -35.83%.

VTIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTGX and VTIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer