VRTGX vs. FAMFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VRTGX (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) and FAMFX (FAM Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VRTGX returned 11.55%/yr vs 6.87%/yr for FAMFX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VRTGX charges 0.08%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for FAMFX.

Performance

VRTGX vs. FAMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) and FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTGX achieves a 18.46% return, which is significantly higher than FAMFX's -6.26% return. Over the past 10 years, VRTGX has outperformed FAMFX with an annualized return of 11.55%, while FAMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.87% annualized return.

VRTGX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 18.46%
• 6M: 16.83%
• 1Y: 39.45%
• 3Y*: 18.76%
• 5Y*: 6.15%
• 10Y*: 11.55%

FAMFX

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: -6.26%
• 6M: -6.36%
• 1Y: -14.29%
• 3Y*: 1.42%
• 5Y*: 0.62%
• 10Y*: 6.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTGX vs. FAMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	18.46%	12.97%	15.26%	18.80%	-26.30%	2.82%	34.81%	28.84%	-9.21%	22.27%
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund	-6.26%	-11.60%	12.43%	20.10%	-12.42%	27.72%	10.10%	26.89%	-8.54%	4.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTGX and FAMFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2012	0.83

The correlation between VRTGX and FAMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VRTGX vs. FAMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTGX

VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FAMFX

FAMFX Risk / Return Rank: 1
FAMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FAMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FAMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FAMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FAMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTGX vs. FAMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) and FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VRTGX	FAMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	-0.77	+2.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	-1.06	+3.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.88	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	-0.61	+3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.20	-1.15	+11.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VRTGX vs. FAMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the FAMFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTGX and FAMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VRTGX	FAMFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	-0.77	+2.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.03	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.35	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.48	+0.04

Drawdowns

VRTGX vs. FAMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTGX drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, which is greater than FAMFX's maximum drawdown of -39.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTGX and FAMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRTGX	FAMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.97%	-39.66%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.80%	-22.23%	+7.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.54%	-28.71%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.48%	-28.71%	-11.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.97%	-39.66%	-2.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-23.83%	+23.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.44%	-5.94%	-4.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	11.71%	-7.61%

Volatility

VRTGX vs. FAMFX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) at 4.91%. This indicates that VRTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VRTGX	FAMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.44%	4.91%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.87%	12.85%	+3.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.37%	17.41%	+3.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.55%	18.72%	+5.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.51%	19.53%	+4.98%

VRTGX vs. FAMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMFX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

VRTGX vs. FAMFX - Dividend Comparison

VRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than FAMFX's 3.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund	3.64%	3.41%	4.43%	6.44%	0.36%	6.55%	0.00%	0.47%	10.85%	2.15%	2.99%	0.24%
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.60%	0.57%	0.62%	0.85%	0.78%	0.54%	0.53%	0.90%	0.85%	0.75%	1.07%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRTGX and FAMFX in my portfolio?

VRTGX and FAMFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VRTGX or FAMFX?

VRTGX has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to FAMFX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTGX dropped -41.97% vs FAMFX's -39.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.