PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YUMC vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YUMC vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUMC achieves a -8.96% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.


YUMC

1D
-1.04%
1M
-9.65%
YTD
-8.96%
6M
-7.99%
1Y
1.21%
3Y*
-8.17%
5Y*
-7.48%
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YUMC vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
-8.96%1.18%15.41%-21.60%10.75%-11.99%19.48%44.85%-15.28%53.59%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between YUMC and SPY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016

0.36

The correlation between YUMC and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YUMC vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUMC
YUMC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
YUMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YUMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
YUMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
YUMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
YUMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YUMC vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YUMCSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.05

2.38

-2.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.26

3.24

-2.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.43

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

3.16

-3.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.12

14.72

-14.59

YUMC vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YUMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUMC and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YUMCSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

2.38

-2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.82

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.59

-0.40

Drawdowns

YUMC vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUMC drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, roughly equal to the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUMC and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YUMCSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.49%

-55.19%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.89%

-8.88%

-17.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.42%

-18.76%

-32.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.45%

-24.50%

-31.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.43%

-0.70%

-32.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-9.05%

-10.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.97%

1.91%

+8.06%

Volatility

YUMC vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that YUMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YUMCSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

2.84%

+2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.91%

8.90%

+10.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.41%

11.83%

+13.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.20%

17.05%

+20.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.41%

17.94%

+17.47%

Dividends

YUMC vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
2.47%2.01%1.33%1.23%0.88%0.96%0.42%1.00%1.25%0.25%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YUMC and SPY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YUMC has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YUMC dropped -56.49% vs SPY's -55.19%.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YUMC and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer