PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
YUMC vs. ETN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

YUMC vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
22.74%
8.39%
YUMC
ETN

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUMC achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 50.91% return.


YUMC

YTD

12.72%

1M

7.13%

6M

21.55%

1Y

4.64%

5Y (annualized)

2.98%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

ETN

YTD

50.91%

1M

3.39%

6M

9.38%

1Y

59.54%

5Y (annualized)

34.71%

10Y (annualized)

21.59%

Fundamentals


YUMCETN
Market Cap$18.69B$145.82B
EPS$2.27$9.41
PE Ratio21.6939.21
PEG Ratio1.373.21
Total Revenue (TTM)$11.20B$24.61B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.55B$9.52B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.58B$4.99B

Key characteristics


YUMCETN
Sharpe Ratio0.122.23
Sortino Ratio0.502.78
Omega Ratio1.061.40
Calmar Ratio0.083.09
Martin Ratio0.239.96
Ulcer Index19.78%6.13%
Daily Std Dev39.44%27.41%
Max Drawdown-56.49%-68.95%
Current Drawdown-29.41%-3.48%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between YUMC and ETN is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

YUMC vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for YUMC, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.122.23
The chart of Sortino ratio for YUMC, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.502.78
The chart of Omega ratio for YUMC, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.061.40
The chart of Calmar ratio for YUMC, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.083.09
The chart of Martin ratio for YUMC, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.239.96
YUMC
ETN

The current YUMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUMC and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.12
2.23
YUMC
ETN

Dividends

YUMC vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than ETN's 1.05% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
1.29%1.23%0.88%0.96%0.42%1.00%1.25%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.05%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%2.21%

Drawdowns

YUMC vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUMC drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUMC and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-29.41%
-3.48%
YUMC
ETN

Volatility

YUMC vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) has a higher volatility of 10.57% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 8.44%. This indicates that YUMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.57%
8.44%
YUMC
ETN

Financials

YUMC vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Yum China Holdings, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items