PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
YUMC vs. ETN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between YUMC and ETN is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

YUMC vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
38.25%
13.66%
YUMC
ETN

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

YUMC:

0.80

ETN:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

YUMC:

1.49

ETN:

0.96

Omega Ratio

YUMC:

1.18

ETN:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

YUMC:

0.56

ETN:

1.03

Martin Ratio

YUMC:

1.99

ETN:

2.79

Ulcer Index

YUMC:

15.91%

ETN:

7.32%

Daily Std Dev

YUMC:

39.77%

ETN:

31.87%

Max Drawdown

YUMC:

-56.29%

ETN:

-68.95%

Current Drawdown

YUMC:

-31.04%

ETN:

-16.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

YUMC:

$17.23B

ETN:

$124.37B

EPS

YUMC:

$2.31

ETN:

$9.49

PE Ratio

YUMC:

19.81

ETN:

33.16

PEG Ratio

YUMC:

1.29

ETN:

2.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

YUMC:

$8.71B

ETN:

$24.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

YUMC:

$1.53B

ETN:

$13.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

YUMC:

$1.42B

ETN:

$4.16B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with YUMC having a -5.00% return and ETN slightly lower at -5.17%.


YUMC

YTD

-5.00%

1M

2.58%

6M

38.25%

1Y

30.05%

5Y*

2.00%

10Y*

N/A

ETN

YTD

-5.17%

1M

-8.14%

6M

13.66%

1Y

18.25%

5Y*

27.91%

10Y*

19.52%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

YUMC vs. ETN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of YUMC is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of YUMC is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of YUMC is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ETN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETN is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETN is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETN is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETN is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETN is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETN is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

YUMC vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for YUMC, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.800.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for YUMC, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.490.96
The chart of Omega ratio for YUMC, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.181.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for YUMC, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.561.03
The chart of Martin ratio for YUMC, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.992.79
YUMC
ETN

The current YUMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUMC and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.80
0.64
YUMC
ETN

Dividends

YUMC vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than ETN's 1.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
1.75%1.66%1.23%0.88%0.96%0.42%1.00%1.25%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.19%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%

Drawdowns

YUMC vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUMC drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUMC and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-31.04%
-16.64%
YUMC
ETN

Volatility

YUMC vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) is 10.41%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 19.17%. This indicates that YUMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.41%
19.17%
YUMC
ETN

Financials

YUMC vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Yum China Holdings, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab