YUMC vs. ETN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN).

Performance

YUMC vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

YUMC vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	2.75%	1.18%	15.41%	-21.60%	10.75%	-11.99%	19.48%	44.85%	-15.28%	53.59%
ETN Eaton Corporation plc	12.64%	-2.79%	39.51%	56.22%	-7.18%	46.70%	29.88%	42.76%	-10.04%	21.54%

Fundamentals

Market Cap YUMC : $17.51B ETN : $139.31B
EPS YUMC : $2.53 ETN : $10.47
PE Ratio YUMC : 19.25 ETN : 34.18
PEG Ratio YUMC : 1.28 ETN : 1.86
PS Ratio YUMC : 1.52 ETN : 5.09
PB Ratio YUMC : 3.26 ETN : 7.16
Total Revenue (TTM) YUMC : $11.80B ETN : $27.45B
Gross Profit (TTM) YUMC : $2.17B ETN : $10.32B
EBITDA (TTM) YUMC : $1.64B ETN : $5.90B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUMC achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 12.64% return.

YUMC

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -10.67%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: -4.27%
• 3Y*: -6.81%
• 5Y*: -2.45%
• 10Y*: —

ETN

• 1D: 4.12%
• 1M: -4.56%
• YTD: 12.64%
• 6M: -3.87%
• 1Y: 33.19%
• 3Y*: 29.57%
• 5Y*: 22.72%
• 10Y*: 21.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

YUMC vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUMC

YUMC Risk / Return Rank: 34
YUMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
YUMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
YUMC Omega Ratio Rank: 30
YUMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
YUMC Martin Ratio Rank: 38

ETN

ETN Risk / Return Rank: 72
ETN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ETN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ETN Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ETN Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ETN Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YUMC vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YUMC	ETN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	0.97	-1.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	1.49	-1.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.20	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	1.68	-1.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.29	3.74	-4.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YUMC vs. ETN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YUMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUMC and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YUMC	ETN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14	0.97	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	0.78	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.41	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between YUMC and ETN is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

YUMC vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than ETN's 1.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	2.07%	2.01%	1.33%	1.23%	0.88%	0.96%	0.42%	1.00%	1.25%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%
ETN Eaton Corporation plc	1.18%	1.31%	1.13%	1.43%	2.06%	1.76%	1.88%	3.00%	3.85%	3.04%	3.40%	4.23%

Drawdowns

YUMC vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUMC drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUMC and ETN.

Drawdown Indicators

	YUMC	ETN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.49%	-68.95%	+12.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.35%	-19.14%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.49%	-34.46%	-22.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.87%	-9.42%	-15.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.19%	-14.93%	-4.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.45%	8.57%	+4.88%

Volatility

YUMC vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) is 7.74%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 11.84%. This indicates that YUMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YUMC	ETN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.74%	11.84%	-4.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.95%	23.36%	-4.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.47%	34.34%	-2.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.24%	29.20%	+8.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.62%	29.65%	+5.97%

Financials

YUMC vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Yum China Holdings, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

YUMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 538.00M and revenue of 2.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

ETN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.60B and revenue of 7.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

YUMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 187.00M and revenue of 2.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

ETN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.38B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

YUMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 140.00M and revenue of 2.82B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.

ETN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.