PortfoliosLab logo
YUMC vs. ETN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between YUMC and ETN is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

YUMC vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

YUMC:

0.37

ETN:

-0.00

Sortino Ratio

YUMC:

0.87

ETN:

0.29

Omega Ratio

YUMC:

1.10

ETN:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

YUMC:

0.25

ETN:

0.02

Martin Ratio

YUMC:

1.14

ETN:

0.05

Ulcer Index

YUMC:

12.64%

ETN:

14.21%

Daily Std Dev

YUMC:

42.02%

ETN:

38.42%

Max Drawdown

YUMC:

-56.49%

ETN:

-68.95%

Current Drawdown

YUMC:

-33.67%

ETN:

-12.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

YUMC:

$16.64B

ETN:

$128.85B

EPS

YUMC:

$2.39

ETN:

$9.91

PE Ratio

YUMC:

18.69

ETN:

33.23

PEG Ratio

YUMC:

1.29

ETN:

2.76

PS Ratio

YUMC:

1.47

ETN:

5.09

PB Ratio

YUMC:

2.88

ETN:

6.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

YUMC:

$11.33B

ETN:

$25.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

YUMC:

$1.92B

ETN:

$9.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

YUMC:

$1.72B

ETN:

$5.80B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUMC achieves a -8.22% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's -0.38% return.


YUMC

YTD

-8.22%

1M

6.36%

6M

-6.45%

1Y

15.33%

3Y*

2.72%

5Y*

-0.52%

10Y*

N/A

ETN

YTD

-0.38%

1M

22.76%

6M

-9.10%

1Y

-0.18%

3Y*

36.93%

5Y*

35.70%

10Y*

19.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Yum China Holdings, Inc.

Eaton Corporation plc

Risk-Adjusted Performance

YUMC vs. ETN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of YUMC is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of YUMC is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of YUMC is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ETN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETN is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETN is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETN is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETN is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETN is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETN is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

YUMC vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current YUMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUMC and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

YUMC vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than ETN's 1.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
1.64%1.33%1.23%0.88%0.96%0.42%1.00%1.25%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.21%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%

Drawdowns

YUMC vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUMC drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUMC and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

YUMC vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) has a higher volatility of 14.29% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 6.93%. This indicates that YUMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

YUMC vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Yum China Holdings, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
2.98B
6.38B
(YUMC) Total Revenue
(ETN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

YUMC vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Yum China Holdings, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
19.2%
38.4%
(YUMC) Gross Margin
(ETN) Gross Margin
YUMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 572.00M and revenue of 2.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.2%.

ETN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 6.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

YUMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 399.00M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

ETN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.20B and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

YUMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 292.00M and revenue of 2.98B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.

ETN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 964.00M and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.