VRNA vs. SEZL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VRNA (Verona Pharma plc) and SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. VRNA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while SEZL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VRNA vs. SEZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verona Pharma plc (VRNA) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

VRNA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SEZL

• 1D: 6.87%
• 1M: 42.00%
• YTD: 90.58%
• 6M: 81.31%
• 1Y: 0.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRNA vs. SEZL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VRNA Verona Pharma plc	0.00%	130.21%	133.60%	12.44%
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock	90.58%	48.89%	1,146.59%	-74.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VRNA and SEZL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023	0.17

The correlation between VRNA and SEZL shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap VRNA : $9.72B SEZL : $4.23B
EPS VRNA : -$0.69 SEZL : $4.15
PS Ratio VRNA : 57.97 SEZL : 8.99
PB Ratio VRNA : 34.92 SEZL : 21.48
Total Revenue (TTM) VRNA : $167.65M SEZL : $480.91M
Gross Profit (TTM) VRNA : $159.52M SEZL : $426.79M
EBITDA (TTM) VRNA : -$40.86M SEZL : $193.18M

Return for Risk

VRNA vs. SEZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEZL

SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 44
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRNA vs. SEZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verona Pharma plc (VRNA) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VRNA	SEZL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.88	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	VRNA	SEZL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-89.95%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-72.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-33.59%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-40.42%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	53.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VRNA	SEZL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	62.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	88.00%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	135.84%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	135.84%	—

Dividends

VRNA vs. SEZL - Dividend Comparison

Neither VRNA nor SEZL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

VRNA vs. SEZL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Verona Pharma plc and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VRNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported a gross profit of 71.68M and revenue of 75.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.4%.

SEZL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

VRNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported an operating income of 9.69M and revenue of 75.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

SEZL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

VRNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported a net income of 8.69M and revenue of 75.14M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

SEZL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRNA and SEZL in my portfolio?

VRNA and SEZL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.