PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRGWX vs. ACIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRGWX vs. ACIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VRGWX having a 8.59% return and ACIHX slightly higher at 8.95%.


VRGWX

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.59%
6M
7.96%
1Y
27.42%
3Y*
25.44%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
19.22%

ACIHX

1D
-0.51%
1M
7.84%
YTD
8.95%
6M
8.02%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRGWX vs. ACIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
8.59%18.32%33.25%42.65%-6.21%
ACIHX
American Century Growth Fund G Class
8.95%16.26%27.35%44.64%-6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VRGWX and ACIHX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022

0.99

The correlation between VRGWX and ACIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRGWX vs. ACIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRGWX
VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ACIHX
ACIHX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ACIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRGWX vs. ACIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRGWXACIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.75

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

5.88

+0.01

VRGWX vs. ACIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRGWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the ACIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRGWX and ACIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRGWXACIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.83

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.02

-0.12

Drawdowns

VRGWX vs. ACIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRGWX drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, which is greater than ACIHX's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRGWX and ACIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRGWXACIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.70%

-24.00%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

-16.40%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.44%

-24.00%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.51%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-4.89%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.81%

4.87%

-0.06%

Volatility

VRGWX vs. ACIHX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRGWXACIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.44%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

11.92%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

15.71%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

21.05%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.16%

21.05%

+0.11%

VRGWX vs. ACIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRGWX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIHX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRGWX vs. ACIHX - Dividend Comparison

VRGWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than ACIHX's 14.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACIHX
American Century Growth Fund G Class
14.64%15.95%5.65%4.61%2.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.43%0.35%0.56%0.71%0.99%4.18%0.77%1.03%1.22%1.22%1.52%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VRGWX and ACIHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACIHX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to VRGWX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRGWX dropped -32.70% vs ACIHX's -24.00%.

VRGWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRGWX and ACIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer