PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VQNPX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VQNPX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth and Income Fund Investor Shares (VQNPX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VQNPX achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, VQNPX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 15.30%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


VQNPX

1D
0.05%
1M
5.79%
YTD
10.42%
6M
10.71%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
23.06%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
15.30%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VQNPX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VQNPX
Vanguard Growth and Income Fund Investor Shares
10.42%19.13%25.72%24.72%-17.26%28.74%17.90%29.66%-4.70%19.82%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VQNPX and FCNTX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 1986

0.89

The correlation between VQNPX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VQNPX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VQNPX
FCNTX

Technology

30.6%
27.0%

Financial Services

12.5%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

10.6%
9.2%

Communication Services

10.1%
21.2%

Industrials

8.9%
8.6%

Energy

5.8%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.7%

Basic Materials

2.9%
2.1%

Utilities

2.4%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.1%

Technology

VQNPX
30.6%
FCNTX
27.0%

Financial Services

VQNPX
12.5%
FCNTX
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VQNPX
11.2%
FCNTX
10.1%

Healthcare

VQNPX
10.6%
FCNTX
9.2%

Communication Services

VQNPX
10.1%
FCNTX
21.2%

Industrials

VQNPX
8.9%
FCNTX
8.6%

Energy

VQNPX
5.8%
FCNTX
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

VQNPX
3.6%
FCNTX
3.7%

Basic Materials

VQNPX
2.9%
FCNTX
2.1%

Utilities

VQNPX
2.4%
FCNTX
0.5%

Real Estate

VQNPX
1.6%
FCNTX
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VQNPX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VQNPX
VQNPX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VQNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VQNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VQNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VQNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VQNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VQNPX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth and Income Fund Investor Shares (VQNPX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VQNPXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

2.13

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.65

9.04

+4.61

VQNPX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VQNPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VQNPX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VQNPXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.72

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.79

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.89

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.78

-0.16

Drawdowns

VQNPX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VQNPX drawdown since its inception was -55.93%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VQNPX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VQNPXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.93%

-49.19%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-11.30%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.68%

-19.75%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.36%

-32.59%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

-32.59%

-1.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-8.16%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.65%

-0.49%

Volatility

VQNPX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Growth and Income Fund Investor Shares (VQNPX) is 3.04%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that VQNPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VQNPXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

3.26%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

10.48%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

14.03%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

19.15%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

19.68%

-1.46%

VQNPX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VQNPX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VQNPX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

VQNPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
VQNPX
Vanguard Growth and Income Fund Investor Shares
9.60%10.60%11.56%8.60%9.69%15.16%6.53%4.09%7.92%5.01%6.90%7.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VQNPX and FCNTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to VQNPX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VQNPX dropped -55.93% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

VQNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VQNPX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer