VQNPX vs. VWUSX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

VQNPX (Vanguard Growth and Income Fund Investor Shares) and VWUSX (Vanguard U.S. Growth Fund Investor Shares) are both mutual funds - VQNPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Vanguard, while VWUSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, VQNPX returned 15.29%/yr vs 19.27%/yr for VWUSX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VQNPX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for VWUSX.

Performance

VQNPX vs. VWUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth and Income Fund Investor Shares (VQNPX) and Vanguard U.S. Growth Fund Investor Shares (VWUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VQNPX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than VWUSX's 5.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VQNPX has underperformed VWUSX with an annualized return of 15.29%, while VWUSX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.27% annualized return.

VQNPX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 5.42%
• YTD: 10.36%
• 6M: 10.92%
• 1Y: 29.31%
• 3Y*: 23.04%
• 5Y*: 14.08%
• 10Y*: 15.29%

VWUSX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 6.62%
• YTD: 5.58%
• 6M: 4.15%
• 1Y: 19.20%
• 3Y*: 22.60%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 19.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VQNPX vs. VWUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VQNPX Vanguard Growth and Income Fund Investor Shares	10.36%	19.13%	25.72%	24.72%	-17.26%	28.74%	17.90%	29.66%	-4.70%	19.82%
VWUSX Vanguard U.S. Growth Fund Investor Shares	5.58%	15.39%	31.65%	45.17%	-39.64%	35.76%	58.63%	45.61%	0.65%	31.11%

Correlation

The correlation between VQNPX and VWUSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 1986	0.91

The correlation between VQNPX and VWUSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

VQNPX vs. VWUSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VQNPX	VWUSX
Technology	30.6%	45.1%
Financial Services	12.5%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	12.4%
Healthcare	10.6%	10.3%
Communication Services	10.1%	16.2%
Industrials	8.9%	5.6%
Energy	5.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	1.2%
Basic Materials	2.9%	0.4%
Utilities	2.4%	0.5%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.3%

Return for Risk

VQNPX vs. VWUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VQNPX

VQNPX Risk / Return Rank: 65
VQNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
VQNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
VQNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
VQNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VQNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

VWUSX

VWUSX Risk / Return Rank: 14
VWUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
VWUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
VWUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
VWUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
VWUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VQNPX vs. VWUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth and Income Fund Investor Shares (VQNPX) and Vanguard U.S. Growth Fund Investor Shares (VWUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VQNPX	VWUSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.22	+1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	1.71	+1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.22	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	1.06	+2.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.00	3.16	+10.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VQNPX vs. VWUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VQNPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the VWUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VQNPX and VWUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VQNPX	VWUSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	1.22	+1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.49	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.79	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.41	+0.21

Drawdowns

VQNPX vs. VWUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VQNPX drawdown since its inception was -55.93%, smaller than the maximum VWUSX drawdown of -73.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VQNPX and VWUSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VQNPX	VWUSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.93%	-73.31%	+17.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-19.15%	+9.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.68%	-25.01%	+5.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.36%	-42.18%	+18.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.33%	-42.18%	+7.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.87%	-22.83%	+13.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	6.43%	-4.27%

Volatility

VQNPX vs. VWUSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Growth and Income Fund Investor Shares (VQNPX) is 3.03%, while Vanguard U.S. Growth Fund Investor Shares (VWUSX) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that VQNPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VQNPX	VWUSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	3.51%	-0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.47%	12.48%	-3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.56%	16.61%	-4.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.11%	26.85%	-9.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.22%	24.64%	-6.42%

VQNPX vs. VWUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VQNPX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than VWUSX's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

VQNPX vs. VWUSX - Dividend Comparison

VQNPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, more than VWUSX's 8.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VQNPX Vanguard Growth and Income Fund Investor Shares	9.61%	10.60%	11.56%	8.60%	9.69%	15.16%	6.53%	4.09%	7.92%	5.01%	6.90%	7.60%
VWUSX Vanguard U.S. Growth Fund Investor Shares	8.87%	9.37%	4.60%	0.28%	0.37%	30.03%	3.90%	11.66%	9.65%	4.63%	1.52%	8.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VQNPX and VWUSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, VQNPX and VWUSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VQNPX or VWUSX?

VWUSX has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to VQNPX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VQNPX dropped -55.93% vs VWUSX's -73.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VQNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.