PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPNG.L vs. QWTM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPNG.L vs. QWTM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VPNG.L is traded in GBP, while QWTM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QWTM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VPNG.L having a 50.78% return and QWTM.L slightly higher at 51.52%.


VPNG.L

1D
-1.94%
1M
10.12%
YTD
50.78%
6M
51.37%
1Y
81.99%
3Y*
31.82%
5Y*
10Y*

QWTM.L

1D
-1.88%
1M
20.99%
YTD
51.52%
6M
41.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPNG.L vs. QWTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VPNG.L and QWTM.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPNG.L vs. QWTM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPNG.L
VPNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VPNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QWTM.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPNG.L vs. QWTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VPNG.LQWTM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.68

VPNG.L vs. QWTM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VPNG.LQWTM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

3.11

-2.40

Drawdowns

VPNG.L vs. QWTM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPNG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.74%, which is greater than QWTM.L's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPNG.L and QWTM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPNG.LQWTM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.74%

-23.74%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-4.22%

+2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.45%

-10.21%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

Volatility

VPNG.L vs. QWTM.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPNG.LQWTM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.38%

39.18%

-16.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

39.18%

-18.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

39.18%

-18.45%

VPNG.L vs. QWTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VPNG.L and QWTM.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

VPNG.L vs. QWTM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VPNG.L nor QWTM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VPNG.L and QWTM.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VPNG.L and QWTM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

VPNG.L tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure v2 Index, while QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPNG.L and QWTM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer