VPN vs. CRTC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VPN (Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - VPN tracks the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VPN returned 73.85% vs 16.75% for CRTC. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VPN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

VPN vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPN achieves a 49.19% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 4.11% return.

VPN

• 1D: -3.02%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 49.19%
• 6M: 51.34%
• 1Y: 73.85%
• 3Y*: 35.46%
• 5Y*: 14.82%
• 10Y*: —

CRTC

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: 4.11%
• 6M: 3.35%
• 1Y: 16.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPN vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF	49.19%	28.99%	14.92%	7.01%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	4.11%	18.69%	18.05%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VPN and CRTC is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.65

The correlation between VPN and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

VPN vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VPN	CRTC
Real Estate	58.0%	0.1%
Technology	30.6%	39.5%
Communication Services	10.5%	15.0%
Financial Services	0.9%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	3.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	6.0%
Healthcare	-	12.7%
Industrials	-	12.6%
Utilities	-	5.3%

Return for Risk

VPN vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPN

VPN Risk / Return Rank: 89
VPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
VPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
VPN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
VPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
VPN Martin Ratio Rank: 87

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 38
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPN vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VPN	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	1.24	+1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	1.70	+2.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.22	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.76	1.86	+3.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.72	6.48	+11.24

VPN vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPN Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPN and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VPN vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPN drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPN and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	VPN	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.98%	-19.07%	-19.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.89%	-9.05%	-3.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-5.35%	+2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.28%	-2.17%	-10.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.18%	2.59%	+1.59%

Volatility

VPN vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 5.76%. This indicates that VPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VPN	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.71%	5.76%	+3.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.51%	10.64%	+7.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.26%	13.55%	+9.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.15%	15.88%	+6.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.10%	15.88%	+6.22%

VPN vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VPN vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

VPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than CRTC's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.91%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF	0.74%	1.10%	1.72%	1.18%	2.57%	1.27%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VPN and CRTC in my portfolio?

VPN and CRTC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VPN or CRTC?

VPN has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to CRTC (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPN dropped -38.98% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, VPN or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, VPN leads with 73.85% vs 16.75% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VPN or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, VPN has performed better with a 73.85% return vs 16.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VPN or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VPN or CRTC?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.74% for VPN.

What is the main difference between VPN and CRTC?

VPN tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VPN and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.