PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPN.L vs. URNG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPN.L vs. URNG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Data Center REITS & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Acc (VPN.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VPN.L is traded in USD, while URNG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the URNG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPN.L achieves a 32.99% return, which is significantly higher than URNG.L's -3.43% return.


VPN.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
-11.30%
6M
21.01%
YTD
32.99%
1Y
49.85%
3Y*
27.82%
5Y*
10Y*

URNG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-14.42%
6M
-21.08%
YTD
-3.43%
1Y
11.84%
3Y*
29.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPN.L vs. URNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VPN.L
Global X Data Center REITS & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Acc
32.99%29.31%13.54%17.68%-21.96%
URNG.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
-3.43%70.46%1.25%37.77%-43.19%

Correlation

The correlation between VPN.L and URNG.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2022

0.47

The correlation between VPN.L and URNG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPN.L vs. URNG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPN.L
VPN.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VPN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VPN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

URNG.L
URNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
URNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
URNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPN.L vs. URNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center REITS & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Acc (VPN.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPN.LURNG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.08

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

0.35

+3.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

0.73

+9.19

VPN.L vs. URNG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPN.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the URNG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPN.L and URNG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPN.L vs. URNG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPN.L drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum URNG.L drawdown of -49.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPN.L and URNG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPN.LURNG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

-49.78%

+10.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-34.12%

+19.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.58%

-38.37%

+12.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.32%

-31.48%

+18.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-24.54%

+9.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.04%

16.32%

-11.28%

Volatility

VPN.L vs. URNG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Data Center REITS & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Acc (VPN.L) is 7.54%, while Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that VPN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPN.LURNG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

10.60%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.51%

36.13%

-18.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.51%

50.88%

-27.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.62%

43.17%

-20.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.62%

43.17%

-20.55%

VPN.L vs. URNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPN.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URNG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

VPN.L vs. URNG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VPN.L nor URNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VPN.L and URNG.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VPN.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VPN.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for URNG.L.

VPN.L is categorized as REIT, while URNG.L is Uranium. VPN.L tracks Global X Data Center REITS & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Acc, while URNG.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VPN.L and 0.65% for URNG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPN.L and URNG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer