VPN.L vs. AREG.L
VPN.L (Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and AREG.L (abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds. VPN.L is passively managed, while AREG.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VPN.L returned 26.86%/yr vs -1.93%/yr for AREG.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VPN.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AREG.L.
Performance
VPN.L vs. AREG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VPN.L is traded in USD, while AREG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AREG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPN.L achieves a 29.81% return, which is significantly higher than AREG.L's 10.09% return.
VPN.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -13.39%
- 6M
- 16.18%
- YTD
- 29.81%
- 1Y
- 44.32%
- 3Y*
- 26.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AREG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 13.91%
- 3Y*
- -1.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VPN.L vs. AREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VPN.L Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 29.81% | 29.31% | 13.54% | 13.16% |
AREG.L abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 10.09% | 8.05% | -22.83% | 11.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPN.L and AREG.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2023 | 0.43 |
The correlation between VPN.L and AREG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPN.L vs. AREG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VPN.L
AREG.L
VPN.L vs. AREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (VPN.L) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VPN.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -93.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 51.70 | -50.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 0.14 | +2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 0.61 | +7.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VPN.L vs. AREG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPN.L drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum AREG.L drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPN.L and AREG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPN.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -99.18% | +60.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.39% | -99.00% | +83.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.58% | -99.18% | +73.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.39% | -18.99% | +3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.64% | -17.34% | +2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 22.88% | -17.74% |
Volatility
VPN.L vs. AREG.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (VPN.L) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) at 2.79%. This indicates that VPN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPN.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 2.79% | +4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.63% | 9.95% | +7.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.60% | 9,914.88% | -9,891.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 6,934.80% | -6,912.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 6,934.80% | -6,912.17% |
VPN.L vs. AREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPN.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AREG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VPN.L vs. AREG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VPN.L nor AREG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VPN.L and AREG.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AREG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AREG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPN.L.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VPN.L and 0.40% for AREG.L.
Find the right allocation for VPN.L and AREG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer