PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPLS vs. VGMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPLS vs. VGMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPLS achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than VGMS's 1.60% return.


VPLS

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.25%
6M
0.34%
YTD
0.65%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGMS

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.15%
6M
1.35%
YTD
1.60%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPLS vs. VGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VPLS and VGMS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.83

The correlation between VPLS and VGMS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPLS vs. VGMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPLS
VPLS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VGMS
VGMS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VGMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGMS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VGMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGMS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPLS vs. VGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPLSVGMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.42

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.02

11.05

-6.03

VPLS vs. VGMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the VGMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPLS and VGMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPLS vs. VGMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPLS drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, which is greater than VGMS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPLS and VGMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPLSVGMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-2.46%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-2.46%

-0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-0.29%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-0.30%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.54%

+0.34%

Volatility

VPLS vs. VGMS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) at 0.89%. This indicates that VPLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPLSVGMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

0.89%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

2.66%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

3.22%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.57%

3.20%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.57%

3.20%

+1.37%

VPLS vs. VGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPLS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VGMS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VPLS vs. VGMS - Dividend Comparison

VPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than VGMS's 5.37% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
VGMS
Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF
5.37%2.94%0.00%0.00%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
4.78%4.78%4.52%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPLS and VGMS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPLS has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to VGMS (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPLS dropped -4.17% vs VGMS's -2.46%.

On 1-year performance, VGMS leads with 6.10% vs 4.77% for VPLS. On fees, VPLS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, VGMS has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VGMS has performed better with a 6.10% return vs 4.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VPLS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGMS.

VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.37%, compared with 4.78% for VPLS.

VPLS is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while VGMS is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VPLS and 0.30% for VGMS.

VGMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPLS and VGMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer