VPLS vs. EUSB
VPLS (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF) and EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. VPLS is actively managed, while EUSB is passively managed. Over the past year, VPLS returned 5.91% vs 5.15% for EUSB. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VPLS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUSB.
Performance
VPLS vs. EUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPLS achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly higher than EUSB's 0.13% return.
VPLS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUSB
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- —
VPLS vs. EUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF | 0.64% | 7.86% | 2.72% | 2.82% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 0.13% | 7.45% | 1.83% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPLS and EUSB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VPLS and EUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPLS vs. EUSB — Risk / Return Rank
VPLS
EUSB
VPLS vs. EUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VPLS | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 2.09 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.10 | 6.26 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VPLS | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.45 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.04 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
VPLS vs. EUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPLS drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, smaller than the maximum EUSB drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPLS and EUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPLS | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -17.87% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | -2.48% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -1.36% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -6.50% | +5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 0.82% | +0.01% |
Volatility
VPLS vs. EUSB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) at 1.17%. This indicates that VPLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPLS | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 1.17% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 2.49% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 3.57% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.61% | 5.77% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.61% | 5.41% | -0.80% |
VPLS vs. EUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPLS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSB's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VPLS vs. EUSB - Dividend Comparison
VPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than EUSB's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.97% | 3.84% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 2.21% | 1.10% | 0.57% |
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF | 4.76% | 4.78% | 4.52% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VPLS and EUSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VPLS has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to EUSB (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPLS dropped -4.17% vs EUSB's -17.87%.
On 1-year performance, VPLS leads with 5.91% vs 5.15% for EUSB. On fees, EUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VPLS has performed better with a 5.91% return vs 5.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VPLS.
VPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 3.97% for EUSB.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VPLS and 0.12% for EUSB.
VPLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPLS and EUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer