VPC vs. UTES
VPC (Virtus Private Credit ETF) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VPC is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Indxx Private Credit Index, while UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. VPC is passively managed, while UTES is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VPC returned 1.17%/yr vs 15.66%/yr for UTES. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VPC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.
Performance
VPC vs. UTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPC achieves a -9.26% return, which is significantly lower than UTES's 0.08% return.
VPC
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -9.26%
- 6M
- -10.18%
- 1Y
- -12.88%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- —
UTES
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -1.81%
- 1Y
- 7.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
VPC vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | -9.26% | -6.75% | 10.52% | 22.20% | -11.70% | 34.18% | -9.50% | 9.32% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 0.08% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 19.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPC and UTES is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2019 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VPC and UTES has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VPC vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VPC
UTES
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VPC
UTES
-
Technology
VPC
UTES
-
Communication Services
VPC
UTES
-
Industrials
VPC
UTES
-
Consumer Cyclical
VPC
UTES
-
Healthcare
VPC
UTES
-
Energy
VPC
UTES
-
Basic Materials
VPC
-
UTES
-
Consumer Defensive
VPC
-
UTES
-
Real Estate
VPC
-
UTES
-
Utilities
VPC
-
UTES
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPC vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank
VPC
UTES
VPC vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VPC | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.08 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 0.57 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 1.30 | -2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VPC | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 0.37 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.76 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.70 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
VPC vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPC drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPC and UTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPC | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.45% | -35.39% | -18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.76% | -13.88% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.86% | -17.62% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -20.40% | -4.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.63% | -9.26% | -10.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -5.52% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.45% | 6.08% | +5.37% |
Volatility
VPC vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) is 3.27%, while Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that VPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPC | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 7.40% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 16.95% | -6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 21.27% | -8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 20.60% | -7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 20.16% | +0.40% |
VPC vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison
VPC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
VPC vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison
VPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.30%, more than UTES's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.50% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | 17.30% | 14.33% | 11.26% | 11.71% | 10.74% | 6.31% | 10.06% | 8.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VPC and UTES have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTES has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to VPC (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPC dropped -53.45% vs UTES's -35.39%.
On 5-year performance, UTES leads with 15.66% vs 1.17% for VPC. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, VPC has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UTES has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VPC.
VPC has the higher dividend yield at 17.30%, compared with 1.50% for UTES.
VPC is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while UTES is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VPC and 0.49% for UTES.
UTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPC and UTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer