PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPC vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPC vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPC achieves a -9.26% return, which is significantly lower than UTES's 0.08% return.


VPC

1D
-1.89%
1M
-5.24%
YTD
-9.26%
6M
-10.18%
1Y
-12.88%
3Y*
2.85%
5Y*
1.17%
10Y*

UTES

1D
-0.98%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
0.08%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
7.86%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPC vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VPC
Virtus Private Credit ETF
-9.26%-6.75%10.52%22.20%-11.70%34.18%-9.50%9.32%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.08%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%19.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VPC and UTES is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2019

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between VPC and UTES has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VPC vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VPC
UTES

Financial Services

98.3%

-

Technology

1.3%

-

Communication Services

0.1%

-

Industrials

0.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

100.0%

Financial Services

VPC
98.3%
UTES

-

Technology

VPC
1.3%
UTES

-

Communication Services

VPC
0.1%
UTES

-

Industrials

VPC
0.1%
UTES

-

Consumer Cyclical

VPC
0.1%
UTES

-

Healthcare

VPC
0.0%
UTES

-

Energy

VPC
0.0%
UTES

-

Basic Materials

VPC

-

UTES

-

Consumer Defensive

VPC

-

UTES

-

Real Estate

VPC

-

UTES

-

Utilities

VPC

-

UTES
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPC vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPC
VPC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
VPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPC vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VPCUTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.08

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

0.57

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.13

1.30

-2.42

VPC vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPC Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPC and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VPCUTESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

0.37

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.76

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.70

-0.50

Drawdowns

VPC vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPC drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPC and UTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPCUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.45%

-35.39%

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.76%

-13.88%

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.86%

-17.62%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

-20.40%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.63%

-9.26%

-10.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-5.52%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.45%

6.08%

+5.37%

Volatility

VPC vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) is 3.27%, while Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that VPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPCUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

7.40%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

16.95%

-6.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

21.27%

-8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.50%

20.60%

-7.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.56%

20.16%

+0.40%

VPC vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

VPC vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

VPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.30%, more than UTES's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.50%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%
VPC
Virtus Private Credit ETF
17.30%14.33%11.26%11.71%10.74%6.31%10.06%8.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPC and UTES have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTES has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to VPC (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPC dropped -53.45% vs UTES's -35.39%.

On 5-year performance, UTES leads with 15.66% vs 1.17% for VPC. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, VPC has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UTES has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VPC.

VPC has the higher dividend yield at 17.30%, compared with 1.50% for UTES.

VPC is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while UTES is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VPC and 0.49% for UTES.

UTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPC and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer