VPADX vs. VMVFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VPADX (Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares) and VMVFX (Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares) are both mutual funds - VPADX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Vanguard, while VMVFX is a Global Equities fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, VPADX returned 10.84%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for VMVFX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VPADX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for VMVFX.

Performance

VPADX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VPADX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPADX achieves a 30.38% return, which is significantly higher than VMVFX's 8.43% return. Over the past 10 years, VPADX has outperformed VMVFX with an annualized return of 10.84%, while VMVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.

VPADX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 9.83%
• YTD: 30.38%
• 6M: 33.51%
• 1Y: 54.13%
• 3Y*: 23.36%
• 5Y*: 10.60%
• 10Y*: 10.84%

VMVFX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 8.43%
• 6M: 8.94%
• 1Y: 13.14%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 10.78%
• 10Y*: 9.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPADX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VPADX Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares	30.38%	33.15%	1.24%	15.55%	-15.24%	1.46%	16.56%	17.57%	-13.92%	28.62%
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares	8.43%	12.74%	13.38%	7.82%	-4.48%	23.74%	-3.99%	23.28%	-1.79%	15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between VPADX and VMVFX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between VPADX and VMVFX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VPADX vs. VMVFX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VPADX	VMVFX
Technology	22.6%	20.9%
Industrials	20.5%	11.4%
Financial Services	19.3%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	7.9%
Basic Materials	7.3%	0.2%
Healthcare	5.0%	12.8%
Communication Services	4.8%	9.8%
Real Estate	4.3%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	10.1%
Energy	1.6%	4.3%
Utilities	1.6%	7.1%

Return for Risk

VPADX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPADX

VPADX Risk / Return Rank: 82
VPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
VPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
VPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
VPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

VMVFX

VMVFX Risk / Return Rank: 39
VMVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
VMVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
VMVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
VMVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
VMVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPADX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VPADX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VPADX	VMVFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	1.92	+0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	2.74	+0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.34	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	2.08	+1.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.37	8.13	+7.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VPADX vs. VMVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPADX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the VMVFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPADX and VMVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VPADX	VMVFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	1.92	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	1.01	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.76	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.82	-0.45

Drawdowns

VPADX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPADX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPADX and VMVFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VPADX	VMVFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.28%	-33.09%	-22.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.41%	-6.27%	-7.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.37%	-7.96%	-8.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.17%	-13.02%	-18.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.67%	-33.09%	-0.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-0.18%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.75%	-2.83%	-8.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	1.60%	+1.85%

Volatility

VPADX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VPADX) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 1.94%. This indicates that VPADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VPADX	VMVFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	1.94%	+4.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.11%	5.17%	+9.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.48%	6.81%	+11.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.43%	10.76%	+5.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	12.48%	+3.76%

VPADX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPADX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VPADX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison

VPADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than VMVFX's 9.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares	9.20%	9.98%	3.77%	3.05%	4.96%	12.73%	2.02%	5.12%	7.27%	2.30%	2.71%	3.22%
VPADX Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares	2.71%	3.99%	3.13%	3.09%	2.73%	3.15%	1.79%	2.83%	3.03%	2.57%	2.65%	2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VPADX and VMVFX in my portfolio?

VPADX and VMVFX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VPADX or VMVFX?

VPADX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to VMVFX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPADX dropped -55.28% vs VMVFX's -33.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VPADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.