VOYG vs. EMBJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG) and Embraer S.A (EMBJ).
Performance
VOYG vs. EMBJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VOYG vs. EMBJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VOYG Voyager Technologies, Inc. | -10.52% | -53.72% |
EMBJ Embraer S.A | -7.81% | 35.76% |
Fundamentals
VOYG:
$1.37B
EMBJ:
$10.88B
VOYG:
-$1.81
EMBJ:
$1.72
VOYG:
8.16
EMBJ:
1.50
VOYG:
3.56
EMBJ:
3.04
VOYG:
$166.42M
EMBJ:
$7.26B
VOYG:
$19.89M
EMBJ:
$1.32B
VOYG:
-$95.92M
EMBJ:
$850.10M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOYG achieves a -10.52% return, which is significantly lower than EMBJ's -7.81% return.
VOYG
- 1D
- 6.66%
- 1M
- -12.36%
- YTD
- -10.52%
- 6M
- -21.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMBJ
- 1D
- 6.75%
- 1M
- -17.83%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- 29.67%
- 3Y*
- 54.10%
- 5Y*
- 43.63%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOYG vs. EMBJ — Risk / Return Rank
VOYG
EMBJ
VOYG vs. EMBJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG) and Embraer S.A (EMBJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOYG | EMBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.13 | -0.89 |
Correlation
The correlation between VOYG and EMBJ is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
VOYG vs. EMBJ - Dividend Comparison
VOYG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOYG Voyager Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMBJ Embraer S.A | 0.98% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 1.65% | 0.45% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
VOYG vs. EMBJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOYG drawdown since its inception was -68.15%, smaller than the maximum EMBJ drawdown of -90.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOYG and EMBJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOYG | EMBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.15% | -90.53% | +22.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -85.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.59% | -25.72% | -32.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.82% | -40.42% | -4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.78% | — |
Volatility
VOYG vs. EMBJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VOYG | EMBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.86% | 42.43% | +45.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.86% | 47.30% | +40.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.86% | 49.36% | +38.50% |
Financials
VOYG vs. EMBJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Voyager Technologies, Inc. and Embraer S.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VOYG vs. EMBJ - Profitability Comparison
VOYG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Voyager Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 46.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EMBJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Embraer S.A reported a gross profit of 350.13M and revenue of 2.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.2%.
VOYG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Voyager Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -34.03M and revenue of 46.65M, resulting in an operating margin of -72.9%.
EMBJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Embraer S.A reported an operating income of 191.27M and revenue of 2.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
VOYG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Voyager Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -30.22M and revenue of 46.65M, resulting in a net margin of -64.8%.
EMBJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Embraer S.A reported a net income of 116.73M and revenue of 2.04B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.