PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOV vs. VCLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOV vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOV achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than VCLT's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOV has outperformed VCLT with an annualized return of 12.14%, while VCLT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.


VOOV

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
7.89%
6M
7.27%
1Y
21.39%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
12.14%

VCLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.31%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.30%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
-2.16%
10Y*
2.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOV vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
7.89%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%7.18%-1.90%11.17%-25.50%-1.73%13.27%23.89%-7.04%11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOV and VCLT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.00

Over the past year, VOOV and VCLT have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOV vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VCLT
VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOV vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOVVCLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.14

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.22

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.00

2.95

+10.05

VOOV vs. VCLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the VCLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOV and VCLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOOV vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, which is greater than VCLT's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and VCLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOVVCLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.31%

-34.31%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-5.25%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-13.03%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-34.31%

+16.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

-34.31%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-14.12%

+13.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-8.17%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.17%

-0.52%

Volatility

VOOV vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) at 1.91%. This indicates that VOOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOVVCLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

1.91%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.36%

5.84%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

7.84%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

12.76%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

12.85%

+4.11%

VOOV vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOV vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison

VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than VCLT's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.53%5.51%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.67%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOV and VCLT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOV has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to VCLT (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs VCLT's -34.31%.

On 10-year performance, VOOV leads with 12.14% vs 2.24% for VCLT. On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VCLT has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOOV.

VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 1.67% for VOOV.

VOOV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VCLT is Corporate Bonds. VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while VCLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOV and 0.03% for VCLT.

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOV and VCLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer