VOOV vs. FDETX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

VOOV (Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF) and FDETX (Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VOOV returned 11.89%/yr vs 15.83%/yr for FDETX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VOOV charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for FDETX.

Performance

VOOV vs. FDETX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VOOV having a 12.00% return and FDETX slightly lower at 11.87%. Over the past 10 years, VOOV has underperformed FDETX with an annualized return of 11.89%, while FDETX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.83% annualized return.

VOOV

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 2.31%
• 6M: 8.38%
• YTD: 12.00%
• 1Y: 22.08%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: 11.89%
• ALL TIME*: 12.29%

FDETX

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 8.00%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 1Y: 24.99%
• 3Y*: 23.79%
• 5Y*: 16.79%
• 10Y*: 15.83%
• ALL TIME*: 15.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF	$18.18M	$15.18M	$15.44M

VOOV vs. FDETX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF	12.00%	13.10%	12.21%	22.15%	-5.37%	24.87%	1.23%	31.75%	-9.09%	15.26%
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O	11.87%	27.60%	27.07%	24.20%	-8.00%	25.32%	9.12%	31.39%	-9.09%	16.45%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOV and FDETX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010	0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between VOOV and FDETX has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

VOOV vs. FDETX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VOOV

VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 86
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FDETX

FDETX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FDETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FDETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FDETX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FDETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FDETX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VOOV vs. FDETX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOOV	FDETX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	1.77	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	2.48	+0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.31	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	2.41	+1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.62	10.70	+2.92

VOOV vs. FDETX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FDETX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOV and FDETX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOOV vs. FDETX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, smaller than the maximum FDETX drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and FDETX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOOV	FDETX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.31%	-66.86%	+29.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.27%	-9.64%	+3.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.55%	-19.76%	+2.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.10%	-21.72%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.31%	-36.61%	-0.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.13%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-11.18%	+7.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	2.17%	-0.55%

Volatility

VOOV vs. FDETX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is 2.69%, while Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that VOOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDETX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOOV	FDETX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	3.56%	-0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.19%	10.20%	-3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.91%	13.15%	-3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.36%	17.58%	-3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.89%	18.75%	-1.86%

VOOV vs. FDETX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FDETX's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOOV vs. FDETX - Dividend Comparison

VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than FDETX's 9.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O	9.24%	10.34%	8.95%	4.39%	5.66%	5.63%	4.47%	7.46%	15.81%	5.34%	2.92%	5.97%
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF	1.64%	1.76%	2.10%	1.69%	2.19%	1.87%	2.45%	2.10%	2.65%	2.13%	2.24%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOOV and FDETX in my portfolio?

VOOV and FDETX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOOV or FDETX?

FDETX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to VOOV (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs FDETX's -66.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.