VOOG vs. PMJN
VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) and PMJN (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while PMJN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. VOOG is passively managed, while PMJN is actively managed. Over the past year, VOOG returned 34.04% vs 6.52% for PMJN. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOOG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMJN.
Performance
VOOG vs. PMJN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than PMJN's 2.33% return.
VOOG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 34.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.15%
PMJN
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- 6.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOOG vs. PMJN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.78% | 18.48% |
PMJN PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June | 2.33% | 4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOG and PMJN is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between VOOG and PMJN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOG vs. PMJN — Risk / Return Rank
VOOG
PMJN
VOOG vs. PMJN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOOG | PMJN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.97 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 5.69 | -3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 37.72 | -27.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOOG | PMJN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 3.75 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 3.81 | -2.91 |
Drawdowns
VOOG vs. PMJN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, which is greater than PMJN's maximum drawdown of -1.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and PMJN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOG | PMJN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -1.15% | -31.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -1.15% | -12.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.11% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -0.08% | -4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 0.17% | +3.14% |
Volatility
VOOG vs. PMJN - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) at 0.19%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMJN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOG | PMJN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 0.19% | +4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 1.42% | +10.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.85% | 1.75% | +14.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 1.75% | +19.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 1.75% | +18.98% |
VOOG vs. PMJN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PMJN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOOG vs. PMJN - Dividend Comparison
VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while PMJN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMJN PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOOG and PMJN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOOG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to PMJN (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs PMJN's -1.15%.
On 1-year performance, VOOG leads with 34.04% vs 6.52% for PMJN. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PMJN has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 34.04% return vs 6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMJN.
VOOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for PMJN.
VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while PMJN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.50% for PMJN.
PMJN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOOG and PMJN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer