VOOG vs. MOAT
VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOOG returned 17.86%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for MOAT. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOOG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.
Performance
VOOG vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 17.86%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.47% annualized return.
VOOG
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 9.67%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- 25.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.86%
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 12.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
VOOG vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.67% | 22.11% | 35.89% | 29.96% | -29.48% | 31.95% | 33.35% | 30.93% | -0.21% | 27.19% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.66% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOG and MOAT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VOOG and MOAT has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VOOG vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOOG
MOAT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
VOOG
MOAT
Communication Services
VOOG
MOAT
Consumer Cyclical
VOOG
MOAT
Financial Services
VOOG
MOAT
Industrials
VOOG
MOAT
Healthcare
VOOG
MOAT
Consumer Defensive
VOOG
MOAT
Real Estate
VOOG
MOAT
Utilities
VOOG
MOAT
-
Basic Materials
VOOG
MOAT
-
Energy
VOOG
MOAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOG vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
VOOG
MOAT
VOOG vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOOG | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.16 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.02 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | 3.11 | +5.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOOG vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, roughly equal to the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOG | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -33.31% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -12.43% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.18% | -21.44% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.73% | -23.96% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.73% | -33.31% | +0.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -4.45% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -3.83% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 4.06% | -0.66% |
Volatility
VOOG vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.13%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOG | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 4.13% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | 9.90% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 13.93% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 18.20% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 18.68% | +2.10% |
VOOG vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOOG vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than MOAT's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOOG and MOAT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOOG has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.86% vs 13.47% for MOAT. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.
MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.
VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.47% for MOAT.
VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOOG and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer