PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 17.86%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.47% annualized return.


VOOG

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.61%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
25.78%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
17.86%

MOAT

1D
0.41%
1M
3.44%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
12.57%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.67%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.66%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and MOAT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between VOOG and MOAT has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VOOG vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOG
MOAT

Technology

49.4%
32.8%

Communication Services

18.0%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.3%

Financial Services

8.8%
6.7%

Industrials

6.2%
13.5%

Healthcare

5.8%
16.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
17.5%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.8%

Utilities

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

0.4%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Technology

VOOG
49.4%
MOAT
32.8%

Communication Services

VOOG
18.0%
MOAT
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOG
9.4%
MOAT
10.3%

Financial Services

VOOG
8.8%
MOAT
6.7%

Industrials

VOOG
6.2%
MOAT
13.5%

Healthcare

VOOG
5.8%
MOAT
16.0%

Consumer Defensive

VOOG
1.0%
MOAT
17.5%

Real Estate

VOOG
0.6%
MOAT
0.8%

Utilities

VOOG
0.4%
MOAT

-

Basic Materials

VOOG
0.4%
MOAT

-

Energy

VOOG
0.1%
MOAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOGMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.16

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.02

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.11

3.11

+5.00

VOOG vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, roughly equal to the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-33.31%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-12.43%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-21.44%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-23.96%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-33.31%

+0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-4.45%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-3.83%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

4.06%

-0.66%

Volatility

VOOG vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.13%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

4.13%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

9.90%

+3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

13.93%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

18.20%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.78%

18.68%

+2.10%

VOOG vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOOG vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than MOAT's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.36%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOG and MOAT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.86% vs 13.47% for MOAT. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.

VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.47% for MOAT.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer