VOOG vs. IXC
VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOOG returned 17.86%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for IXC. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOOG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
VOOG vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 29.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 17.86%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.05% annualized return.
VOOG
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 9.67%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- 25.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.86%
IXC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 29.17%
- 6M
- 28.84%
- 1Y
- 38.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
VOOG vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.67% | 22.11% | 35.89% | 29.96% | -29.48% | 31.95% | 33.35% | 30.93% | -0.21% | 27.19% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 29.17% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOG and IXC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.46 |
The correlation between VOOG and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOOG vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOOG
IXC
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Technology
VOOG
IXC
-
Communication Services
VOOG
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOOG
IXC
-
Financial Services
VOOG
IXC
-
Industrials
VOOG
IXC
-
Healthcare
VOOG
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
VOOG
IXC
-
Real Estate
VOOG
IXC
-
Utilities
VOOG
IXC
-
Basic Materials
VOOG
IXC
-
Energy
VOOG
IXC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOG vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
VOOG
IXC
VOOG vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOOG | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 4.05 | -2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | 11.55 | -3.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOOG vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOG | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -67.88% | +35.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -9.66% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.18% | -19.06% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.73% | -24.93% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.73% | -64.16% | +31.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -7.04% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -17.47% | +12.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.38% | +0.02% |
Volatility
VOOG vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) have volatilities of 6.29% and 6.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOG | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 6.44% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | 15.63% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 18.79% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 23.53% | -2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 26.84% | -6.06% |
VOOG vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOOG vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than IXC's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.85% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOOG and IXC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to VOOG (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.86% vs 10.05% for IXC. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOG has been the lower-risk option at 6.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.
VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while IXC is Energy Equities. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.40% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOOG and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer