VOLT vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOLT is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOLT charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.

Performance

VOLT vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOLT achieves a 36.32% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 268.21% return.

VOLT

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 36.32%
• 6M: 35.03%
• 1Y: 62.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 57.23%
• YTD: 268.21%
• 6M: 315.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOLT vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	36.32%	6.00%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	268.21%	172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between VOLT and LRCU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

VOLT vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 91
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOLT vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOLT	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.90	—	—

Drawdowns

VOLT vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOLT drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum LRCU drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOLT and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOLT	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.40%	-40.09%	+16.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.76%	0.00%	-4.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-9.34%	+4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VOLT	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.23%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.28%	113.97%	-92.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.40%	113.97%	-89.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.40%	113.97%	-89.57%

VOLT vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOLT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOLT vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.33%	0.46%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOLT and LRCU in my portfolio?

VOLT and LRCU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VOLT or LRCU?

On fees, VOLT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOLT or LRCU?

VOLT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOLT or LRCU?

VOLT has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between VOLT and LRCU?

VOLT is categorized as Energy Equities, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tema and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VOLT and 1.30% for LRCU.