VOLT vs. ACWV

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds. VOLT is actively managed, while ACWV is passively managed. Over the past year, VOLT returned 46.42% vs 6.12% for ACWV. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOLT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

VOLT vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOLT achieves a 30.34% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 3.64% return.

VOLT

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: -5.89%
• 6M: 21.72%
• YTD: 30.34%
• 1Y: 46.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWV

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 0.81%
• 6M: 2.67%
• YTD: 3.64%
• 1Y: 6.12%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: 5.48%
• 10Y*: 6.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOLT vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	30.34%	25.92%	-8.98%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	3.64%	11.04%	-3.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VOLT and ACWV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.33

The correlation between VOLT and ACWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOLT vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOLT	ACWV
Industrials	42.7%	8.1%
Utilities	34.8%	7.3%
Technology	12.8%	25.8%
Energy	5.0%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	2.3%	5.1%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.5%
Financial Services	0.5%	13.2%
Communication Services	-	11.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.8%
Healthcare	-	13.0%
Real Estate	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

VOLT vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 79
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 71
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 25
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 24
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOLT vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOLT	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	0.77	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	1.14	+1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.14	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.51	0.97	+3.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.23	2.75	+9.48

VOLT vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOLT and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOLT vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOLT drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum ACWV drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOLT and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOLT	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.40%	-28.82%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.34%	-6.37%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.34%	-1.70%	-8.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.18%	-3.11%	-2.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	2.23%	+1.58%

Volatility

VOLT vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 3.29%. This indicates that VOLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOLT	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.87%	3.29%	+6.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.83%	6.28%	+13.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.24%	8.05%	+15.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.00%	10.28%	+14.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.00%	12.29%	+12.71%

VOLT vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOLT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOLT vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than ACWV's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.94%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.35%	0.46%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOLT and ACWV in my portfolio?

VOLT and ACWV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOLT or ACWV?

VOLT has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to ACWV (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOLT dropped -23.40% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

Which ETF is better, VOLT or ACWV?

On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 46.42% vs 6.12% for ACWV. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOLT or ACWV?

Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 46.42% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOLT or ACWV?

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOLT or ACWV?

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.35% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between VOLT and ACWV?

They also come from different issuers: Tema and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VOLT and 0.20% for ACWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.