PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOLMX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOLMX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volumetric Fund (VOLMX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOLMX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.79% return. Over the past 10 years, VOLMX has underperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 5.58%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.


VOLMX

1D
2.41%
1M
5.71%
YTD
9.14%
6M
8.08%
1Y
13.37%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
5.58%

RESGX

1D
2.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
27.79%
6M
28.15%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOLMX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOLMX
Volumetric Fund
9.14%1.52%5.77%12.57%-14.29%17.79%10.05%20.13%-10.31%9.08%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
27.79%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VOLMX and RESGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.92

The correlation between VOLMX and RESGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOLMX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOLMX
VOLMX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VOLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VOLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOLMX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volumetric Fund (VOLMX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOLMXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.56

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

5.89

-4.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

21.39

-15.39

VOLMX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOLMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOLMX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOLMXRESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

3.21

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.61

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.71

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.72

-0.41

Drawdowns

VOLMX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOLMX drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOLMX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOLMXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.79%

-37.80%

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-7.84%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-20.50%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.09%

-23.58%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.21%

-37.80%

+9.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

0.00%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-5.00%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.15%

+0.15%

Volatility

VOLMX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Volumetric Fund (VOLMX) is 4.22%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that VOLMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOLMXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

5.45%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

11.00%

-1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

14.41%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

17.26%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

18.71%

-4.08%

VOLMX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOLMX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOLMX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

VOLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than RESGX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.52%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%
VOLMX
Volumetric Fund
1.74%1.89%0.00%3.28%5.47%8.02%1.03%3.36%2.39%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOLMX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to VOLMX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOLMX dropped -49.79% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOLMX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer