VOLMX vs. FPACX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VOLMX (Volumetric Fund) and FPACX (FPA Crescent Fund) are both mutual funds - VOLMX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Volumetric, while FPACX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by FPA. Over the past 10 years, VOLMX returned 5.58%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for FPACX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOLMX charges 1.89%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FPACX.

Performance

VOLMX vs. FPACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volumetric Fund (VOLMX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOLMX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly higher than FPACX's 5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, VOLMX has underperformed FPACX with an annualized return of 5.58%, while FPACX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.

VOLMX

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: 5.71%
• YTD: 9.14%
• 6M: 8.08%
• 1Y: 13.37%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: 5.58%

FPACX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 5.34%
• 6M: 6.34%
• 1Y: 18.57%
• 3Y*: 15.50%
• 5Y*: 8.88%
• 10Y*: 10.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOLMX vs. FPACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VOLMX Volumetric Fund	9.14%	1.52%	5.77%	12.57%	-14.29%	17.79%	10.05%	20.13%	-10.31%	9.08%
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund	5.34%	17.69%	12.42%	20.30%	-9.20%	15.09%	12.14%	20.03%	-7.42%	10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VOLMX and FPACX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 1993	0.79

The correlation between VOLMX and FPACX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VOLMX vs. FPACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOLMX

VOLMX Risk / Return Rank: 19
VOLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
VOLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
VOLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
VOLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
VOLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

FPACX

FPACX Risk / Return Rank: 53
FPACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FPACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FPACX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FPACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FPACX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOLMX vs. FPACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volumetric Fund (VOLMX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VOLMX	FPACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	2.20	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	3.22	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.42	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	2.59	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.99	9.81	-3.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VOLMX vs. FPACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOLMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the FPACX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOLMX and FPACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VOLMX	FPACX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	2.20	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.75	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.77	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.88	-0.58

Drawdowns

VOLMX vs. FPACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOLMX drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, which is greater than FPACX's maximum drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOLMX and FPACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOLMX	FPACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.79%	-31.60%	-18.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-7.37%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.09%	-10.95%	-13.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.09%	-18.47%	-5.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.21%	-29.46%	+1.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.61%	-0.02%	-2.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.50%	-3.88%	-5.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	1.94%	+0.36%

Volatility

VOLMX vs. FPACX - Volatility Comparison

Volumetric Fund (VOLMX) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) at 2.28%. This indicates that VOLMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOLMX	FPACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	2.28%	+1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.20%	6.65%	+2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	8.66%	+2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.95%	11.88%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.63%	13.20%	+1.43%

VOLMX vs. FPACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOLMX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FPACX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOLMX vs. FPACX - Dividend Comparison

VOLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than FPACX's 9.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund	9.11%	9.60%	7.95%	3.72%	0.77%	11.62%	4.80%	4.65%	8.87%	3.70%	4.98%	6.34%
VOLMX Volumetric Fund	1.74%	1.89%	0.00%	3.28%	5.47%	8.02%	1.03%	3.36%	2.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOLMX and FPACX in my portfolio?

VOLMX and FPACX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOLMX or FPACX?

VOLMX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to FPACX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOLMX dropped -49.79% vs FPACX's -31.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.