PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNVYX vs. LSGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNVYX vs. LSGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Fund (VNVYX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNVYX achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly higher than LSGRX's -1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, VNVYX has underperformed LSGRX with an annualized return of 10.88%, while LSGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.


VNVYX

1D
1.42%
1M
-2.51%
6M
6.71%
YTD
16.15%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
20.04%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
10.88%
ALL TIME*
12.04%

LSGRX

1D
2.84%
1M
2.29%
6M
2.45%
YTD
-1.84%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
15.57%
ALL TIME*
9.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VNVYX vs. LSGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNVYX
Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Fund
16.15%12.17%19.45%16.53%-10.59%21.82%10.92%30.53%-15.98%13.21%
LSGRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
-1.84%14.01%35.21%51.30%-27.86%18.68%31.76%31.73%-2.56%32.63%

Correlation

The correlation between VNVYX and LSGRX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2008

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between VNVYX and LSGRX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNVYX vs. LSGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VNVYX
VNVYX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VNVYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNVYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNVYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VNVYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNVYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LSGRX
LSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
LSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
LSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VNVYX vs. LSGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Fund (VNVYX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNVYXLSGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.05

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

0.20

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

0.53

+6.12

VNVYX vs. LSGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNVYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the LSGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNVYX and LSGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNVYX vs. LSGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNVYX drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum LSGRX drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNVYX and LSGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNVYXLSGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-63.63%

+20.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-17.83%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.60%

-27.33%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.60%

-34.69%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

-34.69%

-8.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.28%

-5.11%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-17.91%

+11.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

6.36%

-2.70%

Volatility

VNVYX vs. LSGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Fund (VNVYX) is 5.82%, while Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that VNVYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNVYXLSGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

6.15%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

14.02%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.83%

18.49%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.45%

22.95%

-3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.78%

21.02%

-0.24%

VNVYX vs. LSGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNVYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LSGRX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNVYX vs. LSGRX - Dividend Comparison

VNVYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.54%, more than LSGRX's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSGRX
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund
2.26%2.22%5.62%6.02%16.47%4.73%4.41%2.70%5.82%2.41%1.48%0.54%
VNVYX
Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Fund
38.54%45.02%11.91%0.53%3.46%16.14%12.25%1.07%9.78%2.71%3.33%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNVYX and LSGRX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSGRX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to VNVYX (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNVYX dropped -42.81% vs LSGRX's -63.63%.

VNVYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNVYX and LSGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer