VNRT.L vs. XZMD.L
VNRT.L (Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing) and XZMD.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Vanguard and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VNRT.L returned 18.48%/yr vs 19.56%/yr for XZMD.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNRT.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XZMD.L.
Performance
VNRT.L vs. XZMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VNRT.L is traded in GBP, while XZMD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XZMD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNRT.L achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than XZMD.L's 8.47% return.
VNRT.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
XZMD.L
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 26.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VNRT.L vs. XZMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNRT.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing | 10.09% | 8.77% | 26.36% | 19.99% | -5.17% |
XZMD.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D | 8.47% | 8.37% | 27.57% | 23.85% | -5.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNRT.L and XZMD.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2022 | 0.49 |
The correlation between VNRT.L and XZMD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VNRT.L vs. XZMD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Financial Services
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Communication Services
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Consumer Cyclical
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Industrials
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Healthcare
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Consumer Defensive
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Energy
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Basic Materials
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Utilities
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Real Estate
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNRT.L vs. XZMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
VNRT.L
XZMD.L
VNRT.L vs. XZMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNRT.L | XZMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.74 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 8.29 | -4.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.56 | 25.82 | -13.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNRT.L | XZMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 4.10 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 1.39 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
VNRT.L vs. XZMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNRT.L drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, which is greater than XZMD.L's maximum drawdown of -22.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRT.L and XZMD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNRT.L | XZMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.17% | -22.72% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.77% | -10.21% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.38% | -22.72% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.05% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -5.03% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 7.53% | -5.35% |
Volatility
VNRT.L vs. XZMD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) is 2.57%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.L) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that VNRT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XZMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNRT.L | XZMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 3.90% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 20.73% | -10.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 22.32% | -7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 22.32% | -6.77% |
VNRT.L vs. XZMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNRT.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XZMD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNRT.L vs. XZMD.L - Dividend Comparison
VNRT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XZMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNRT.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.48% | 1.76% | 1.61% | 1.51% | 1.68% |
XZMD.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D | 0.68% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 0.95% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNRT.L and XZMD.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VNRT.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VNRT.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XZMD.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRT.L and 0.15% for XZMD.L.
Find the right allocation for VNRT.L and XZMD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer