VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L
VNRT.L (Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing) and VHVG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VNRT.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while VHVG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VNRT.L returned 14.08%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for VHVG.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VNRT.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VHVG.L.
Performance
VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNRT.L achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly lower than VHVG.L's 11.81% return.
VNRT.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
VHVG.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 29.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- —
VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNRT.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing | 10.09% | 8.77% | 26.36% | 19.99% | -9.98% | 28.99% | 15.42% | 1.92% |
VHVG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc | 11.81% | 13.85% | 19.99% | 17.54% | -8.66% | 23.31% | 12.56% | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNRT.L and VHVG.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.97 |
The correlation between VNRT.L and VHVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Financial Services
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Communication Services
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Industrials
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Healthcare
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Consumer Defensive
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Energy
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Basic Materials
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Utilities
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Real Estate
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VNRT.L
VHVG.L
VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNRT.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.55 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 4.29 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.56 | 17.65 | -5.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNRT.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.90 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.03 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.89 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNRT.L drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, roughly equal to the maximum VHVG.L drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRT.L and VHVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNRT.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.17% | -25.41% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.77% | -6.94% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.38% | -17.96% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -17.96% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.36% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -3.28% | -0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 1.69% | +0.49% |
Volatility
VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) is 2.57%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that VNRT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VHVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNRT.L | VHVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 2.72% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 7.53% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 10.27% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 12.97% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 15.06% | +0.49% |
VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNRT.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VHVG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VNRT.L nor VHVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHVG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNRT.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.48% | 1.76% | 1.61% | 1.51% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VNRT.L and VHVG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VNRT.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VNRT.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VHVG.L.
VNRT.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VHVG.L is Global Equities. VNRT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRT.L and 0.12% for VHVG.L.
Find the right allocation for VNRT.L and VHVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer