PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNRT.L achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly lower than VHVG.L's 11.81% return.


VNRT.L

1D
0.13%
1M
5.67%
YTD
10.09%
6M
9.79%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
14.08%
10Y*
15.64%

VHVG.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.52%
YTD
11.81%
6M
12.27%
1Y
29.87%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VNRT.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing
10.09%8.77%26.36%19.99%-9.98%28.99%15.42%1.92%
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
11.81%13.85%19.99%17.54%-8.66%23.31%12.56%1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between VNRT.L and VHVG.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.97

The correlation between VNRT.L and VHVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNRT.L
VHVG.L

Technology

34.4%
29.0%

Financial Services

13.0%
15.6%

Communication Services

10.9%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.3%

Industrials

8.3%
11.5%

Healthcare

8.2%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.1%

Energy

4.3%
4.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%
3.4%

Utilities

2.3%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

VNRT.L
34.4%
VHVG.L
29.0%

Financial Services

VNRT.L
13.0%
VHVG.L
15.6%

Communication Services

VNRT.L
10.9%
VHVG.L
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VNRT.L
9.8%
VHVG.L
9.3%

Industrials

VNRT.L
8.3%
VHVG.L
11.5%

Healthcare

VNRT.L
8.2%
VHVG.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

VNRT.L
4.7%
VHVG.L
5.1%

Energy

VNRT.L
4.3%
VHVG.L
4.1%

Basic Materials

VNRT.L
2.4%
VHVG.L
3.4%

Utilities

VNRT.L
2.3%
VHVG.L
2.6%

Real Estate

VNRT.L
1.8%
VHVG.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNRT.L
VNRT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VNRT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VHVG.L
VHVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNRT.LVHVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.55

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

4.29

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.56

17.65

-5.08

VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNRT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNRT.L and VHVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNRT.LVHVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.90

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.03

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.89

+0.08

Drawdowns

VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNRT.L drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, roughly equal to the maximum VHVG.L drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRT.L and VHVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNRT.LVHVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.17%

-25.41%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.77%

-6.94%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.38%

-17.96%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-17.96%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.36%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-3.28%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.69%

+0.49%

Volatility

VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing (VNRT.L) is 2.57%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that VNRT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VHVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNRT.LVHVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

2.72%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

7.53%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

10.27%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

12.97%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

15.06%

+0.49%

VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNRT.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VHVG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNRT.L vs. VHVG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VNRT.L nor VHVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNRT.L
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF Distributing
0.00%0.00%0.49%1.24%1.41%1.02%1.43%1.48%1.76%1.61%1.51%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VNRT.L and VHVG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VNRT.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VNRT.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VHVG.L.

VNRT.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VHVG.L is Global Equities. VNRT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRT.L and 0.12% for VHVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNRT.L and VHVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer