PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNRA.DE vs. SXR1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNRA.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRA.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNRA.DE achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly lower than SXR1.DE's 12.59% return.


VNRA.DE

1D
-1.20%
1M
0.83%
6M
9.45%
YTD
11.60%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
14.10%
10Y*

SXR1.DE

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.88%
6M
9.63%
YTD
12.59%
1Y
16.74%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
7.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNRA.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VNRA.DE
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
11.60%5.72%33.35%24.31%-13.97%39.73%8.72%-3.11%
SXR1.DE
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc)
12.59%7.00%11.91%2.20%-0.86%13.17%-2.98%0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between VNRA.DE and SXR1.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2019

0.67

The correlation between VNRA.DE and SXR1.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNRA.DE vs. SXR1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNRA.DE
VNRA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VNRA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SXR1.DE
SXR1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SXR1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNRA.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRA.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNRA.DESXR1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.68

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

7.71

+2.81

VNRA.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNRA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the SXR1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNRA.DE and SXR1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNRA.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNRA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.48%, smaller than the maximum SXR1.DE drawdown of -38.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNRA.DE and SXR1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNRA.DESXR1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.48%

-38.62%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-6.21%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.07%

-20.28%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.07%

-20.28%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-0.56%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-9.81%

+4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.17%

-0.14%

Volatility

VNRA.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRA.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) at 2.41%. This indicates that VNRA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXR1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNRA.DESXR1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

2.41%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

9.37%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

11.97%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

14.75%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

16.49%

+1.26%

VNRA.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNRA.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SXR1.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNRA.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VNRA.DE nor SXR1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SXR1.DE
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNRA.DE
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.26%0.98%1.24%1.45%0.73%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNRA.DE and SXR1.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VNRA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VNRA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SXR1.DE.

VNRA.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SXR1.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. VNRA.DE tracks FTSE North America, while SXR1.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VNRA.DE and 0.20% for SXR1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNRA.DE and SXR1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer