PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNQI vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNQI vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQI achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.41% return.


VNQI

1D
0.68%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
0.85%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
-1.50%
10Y*
2.74%

IBIT

1D
-0.03%
1M
-21.94%
YTD
-27.41%
6M
-29.61%
1Y
-39.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQI vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
-0.33%21.38%0.25%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.41%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQI and IBIT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNQI vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQI
VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQI vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNQIIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.85

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

-0.78

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.13

-1.37

+2.51

VNQI vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQI and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNQI vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQI drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQI and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNQIIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-52.11%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-52.11%

+37.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.99%

-49.45%

+39.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-16.53%

+5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

29.64%

-24.45%

Volatility

VNQI vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) is 4.62%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that VNQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNQIIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

12.07%

-7.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

34.45%

-22.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

44.10%

-30.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.54%

50.26%

-34.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

50.26%

-34.19%

VNQI vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VNQI vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

VNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
4.72%4.70%5.16%3.74%0.57%6.48%0.93%7.58%4.62%3.86%5.18%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNQI and IBIT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to VNQI (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQI dropped -38.35% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

On 1-year performance, VNQI leads with 7.10% vs -39.67% for IBIT. On fees, VNQI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VNQI has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VNQI has performed better with a 7.10% return vs -39.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

VNQI is categorized as REIT, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VNQI and 0.25% for IBIT.

VNQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNQI and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer