VNQ vs. MOAT
VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.53%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for MOAT. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.
Performance
VNQ vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 5.53%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.35% annualized return.
VNQ
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
MOAT
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -2.38%
- 1Y
- 12.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.35%
VNQ vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 11.49% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -1.06% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQ and MOAT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.58 |
The correlation between VNQ and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VNQ vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNQ
MOAT
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
VNQ
MOAT
Basic Materials
VNQ
MOAT
-
Communication Services
VNQ
MOAT
Technology
VNQ
MOAT
Energy
VNQ
MOAT
-
Financial Services
VNQ
MOAT
Industrials
VNQ
MOAT
Consumer Cyclical
VNQ
-
MOAT
Consumer Defensive
VNQ
-
MOAT
Healthcare
VNQ
-
MOAT
Utilities
VNQ
-
MOAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQ vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
VNQ
MOAT
VNQ vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNQ | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 0.99 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 3.02 | +1.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNQ vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQ | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -33.31% | -39.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -12.43% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -21.44% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -23.96% | -10.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.40% | -33.31% | -9.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -4.84% | +4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.61% | -3.83% | -9.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 4.05% | -1.40% |
Volatility
VNQ vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.16%. This indicates that VNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQ | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 4.16% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 10.04% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 13.94% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 18.21% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 18.69% | +2.03% |
VNQ vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
VNQ vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than MOAT's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.57% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQ and MOAT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNQ has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to MOAT (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.35% vs 5.53% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.35% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 1.37% for MOAT.
VNQ is categorized as REIT, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.47% for MOAT.
VNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNQ and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer